Summary
The development of acute and chronic sulphur dioxide (SO2) tolerance in lawn grass populations was studied by two approaches: the minimum time for tolerance to appear in Festuca rubra L., Lolium multiflorum Lam., L. perenne L., Phleum pratense L. and Poa pratensis L., was determined by comparison annually of plant samples from monoculture plots sown at a polluted site, with plants grown from the seed originally sown; the long term development of tolerance in F. rubra, D. glomerata L. and Agrostis tenuis Sibth. was also investigated by comparison of five lawns of different ages (1–c. 200 years) at a polluted site.
Tolerance to acute SO2 injury was detected in L. perenne and Phleum pratense only three and four years after sowing, respectively. However, population samples of these two species, collected from the field three years later, showed no significant SO2 tolerance. An analysis using morphological and isozyme variation as criteria showed that the tolerant population consisted of a large number of different individual genotypes. The populations experienced a state of evolutionary flux with rapid selection first of the tolerant, and subsequently of the non‐tolerant phenotypes. The disappearance of tolerance coincided with declining ambient SO2 concentrations.
The lawns of different ages were shown to represent an evolutionary series of increasing acute SO2 tolerance with age of lawn in F. rubra and A. tenuis. This demonstrated the continuing development of acute SO2 tolerance in grass populations over a prolonged period.
The significance of the occurrence and rate of development of SO2 tolerance for grasslands in polluted areas is discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.