Objective: The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in adults is based on a reduced peak GH response to provocative tests, such as the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and the GH-releasing hormone-arginine (GHRH-ARG) test. However, the cut-off limits of peak GH response in lean subjects are not reliable in obese patients; this is noteworthy since adult GHD is often associated with obesity. Aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic cut-off limits of peak GH response to the GHRH-ARG test in overweight and obese as well as in lean population. Design and methods: The GH responses to the GHRH-ARG test were studied in 322 patients with organic hypothalamic-pituitary disease and in 318 control subjects. Patients were subdivided into two groups on the basis of the number of pituitary hormone deficits, except for GH deficiency: (a) patients with total pituitary hormone deficit (TPHD) and (b) patients without or with no more than two pituitary hormone deficits (PHD). Both patients and control subjects were divided into three subgroups according to body mass index (BMI): lean (BMI , 25 kg/m 2 ), overweight (BMI $ 25 and , 30 kg/m 2 ) and obese (BMI $30 kg/m 2 ). TPHD patients were assumed to be GH deficient, whereas PHD patients may include subjects with either normal or impaired GH secretion. The statistical analysis was carried out by the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve analysis (Medcalc 7.2). The diagnostic cut-off points were calculated for lean, overweight and obese subjects to provide optimal separation of GH-deficient patients and control subjects according to two criteria: (1) a balance between high sensitivity and high specificity; (2) to provide the highest pair of sensitivity/specificity values for GH deficiency. Results: In the lean population the best pair of values, with highest sensitivity as 98.7% and highest specificity as 83.7%, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 11.5 mg/l. In the overweight population the best pair of values, 96.7 and 75.5%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 8.0 mg/l. In the obese population the best pair of values, 93.5 and 78.3%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 4.2 mg/l. Applying the above mentioned cut-off points, among PHD patients we found that 80 subjects (72%) were GHD whereas 31 (28%) had normal GH secretion. Conclusions: In conclusion the GHRH-ARG test is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in lean, overweight and obese patients, provided that specific BMI-related cut-off limits are assumed.European Journal of Endocrinology 153 257-264

Neither MET nor ACTH test can be considered completely reliable for the diagnosis of secondary hypoadrenalism, when compared with ITT that remains the best test. Either MET or ACTH stimulation test, at both high and low dose, show an overall similar reliability, provided that appropriated cut-off values were considered; testing with very low ACTH doses seems to be misleading.

IGF-I is the best marker of GH secretory status but it also depends on the nutritional status and peripheral hormones such as insulin, glucocorticoids, thyroid hormones and gonadal steroids. Though monitoring IGF-I levels is the best way for evaluating appropriate GH replacement, the usefulness of IGF-I assay in the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) is still matter of debate. To clarify this point in a large population of GHD adults (no. = 135, 61 women and 74 men; age, mean +/- SE: 43.8 +/- 1.4 yr, range 20-80 yr) we studied IGF-I levels, their reproducibility and association to peak GH response to GHRH + arginine (GHRH + ARG) test and insulin tolerance test (ITT). The results in GHD were compared with those in a large population of normal subjects (no. = 336, 233 women and 103 men, aged 20-80 yr). Mean IGF-I levels in GHD (77.8 +/- 4.9 micrograms/l) were clearly lower (p < 0.001) than those in normal subjects (170.2 +/- 4.7 micrograms/l). In Childhood Onset GHD (CO-GHD; no. = 40; age, mean +/- SE: 27.8 +/- 1.5 yr) IGF-I levels were lower than those in Adult Onset GHD (AO-GHD; no. = 95, age, mean +/- SE: 50.7 +/- 1.4 yr) (56.6 +/- 9.7 vs 87.1 +/- 5.4 micrograms/l, p < 0.0003). In both GHD and normal subjects IGF-I levels showed good, reproducibility (r = 0.92, p < 0.00001 and r = 0.62, p < 0.00001, respectively). In GHD, but not in normal subjects, IGF-I levels were positively associated to peak GH responses to GHRH + ARG (r = 0.57, p < 0.00001); on the other hand, the GH peak after ITT was not associated to IGF-I in GHD. In normal subjects, but not in GHD, IGF-I levels were negatively associated to age (r = -0.60, p < 0.00001). Considering individual IGF-I levels there was a clear overlap between GHD and normal subjects. However, this overlap was strongly dependent on age. In fact, in the third and fourth decade of life 83.6% of GHD had IGF-I levels below the 3rd centile of normal values; on the other hand, in the fifth-sixth decade and in ageing 47% and only 12% of GHD, respectively, had IGF-I levels low for age. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that IGF-I levels represent a reproducible marker of GH status and are reduced more in CO-GHD than in AO-GHD adults. An overlap exists between GHD and normal subjects, however this is small up to the 4th decade of life. Thus, though normal IGF-I levels do not rule out the existence of GHD, up to 40 yr low IGF-I levels strongly point to GHD if malnutrition and liver disease have been ruled out.

No abstract

No abstract