Interleukin 8 (IL-8), a potent activator of neutrophils, may be important in the early host response to serious Gram-negative infections. IL-8 was measured with other acute phase cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-alpha], IL-6 and IL-1 beta) in 25 normal humans randomized to receive either intravenous endotoxin alone or endotoxin after oral administration of ibuprofen or pentoxifylline, agents that alter some of the inflammatory responses induced by endotoxin in vitro. TNF immunoreactivity was maximum at 1.5 h, and total TNF (area under the curve) was 4.2- and 4.5-fold greater in subjects given endotoxin/ibuprofen compared to subjects given endotoxin alone (p = 0.026) or endotoxin/pentoxifylline (p = 0.004), respectively. IL-6 levels were maximum at 2-3 h and did not differ among the three groups. No IL-1 beta was detected in any subject. IL-8 levels peaked at 2 h in subjects given either endotoxin alone or endotoxin/pentoxifylline, falling towards baseline by 5 h. Subjects given endotoxin/ibuprofen had a more sustained rise in IL-8 with peak levels 2.8- and 2.5-fold higher at 3 h compared to endotoxin alone (p = 0.048) or endotoxin/pentoxifylline (p = 0.023), respectively. Differences in total IL-8 release among groups approached statistical significance (ANOVA, p = 0.07). This trend reflected the increased release of IL-8 by the subjects receiving ibuprofen compared to pentoxifylline (1.9-fold higher; p = 0.024). This suggests that cyclooxygenase products may provide important negative feedback loops for cytokine production in vivo. Increases in circulating IL-8 are part of the acute inflammatory response of humans to endotoxin. Altered cytokine responses caused by antiinflammatory therapy may have important implications for both host defense and injury during septicemia.

No abstract

No abstract

An important focus for meaningful use criteria is to engage patients in their care by allowing them online access to their health information, including test results. There has been little evaluation of such initiatives. Using a mixed methods analysis of electronic health record data, surveys, and qualitative interviews, we examined the impact of allowing patients to view their test results via patient portal in one large health system. Quantitative data were collected for new users and all users of the patient portal. Qualitative interviews occurred with patients who had received an HbA1c or abnormal Pap result. Survey participants were active patient portal users. Our main measures were patient portal usage, factors associated with viewing test results and utilizing care, and patient and provider experiences with patient portal and direct release. Usage data show 80% of all patient portal users viewed test results during the year. Of survey respondents, 82.7% noted test results to be a very useful feature and 70% agreed that patient portal has made their provider more accessible to them. Interviewed patients reported feeling they should have direct access to test results and identified the ability to monitor results over time and prepare prior to communicating with a provider as benefits. In interviews, both patients and physicians reported instances of test results leading to unnecessary patient anxiety. Both groups noted the benefits of results released with provider interpretation. Quantitative data showed patient utilization to increase with viewing test results online, but this effect is mitigated when results are manually released by physicians. Our findings demonstrate that patient portal access to test results was highly valued by patients and appeared to increase patient engagement. However, it may lead to patient anxiety and increase rates of patient visits. We discuss how such unintended consequences can be addressed and larger implications for meaningful use criteria.