The aim of this work was to test in vitro and in vivo the efficacy of the derivatives of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA): hexyl-ALA (He-ALA), undecanoyl-ALA and R,S-2-(hydroximethyl)tetrahydropyranyl-ALA (THP-ALA) as pro-photosensitising agents. The compounds were assayed in a cell line derived from a murine mammary tumour, in tumour explants and after injection of the cells into mice. In vitro, undecanoyl-ALA and THP-ALA did not improve ALA efficacy in terms of porphyrin synthesis. On the other hand, half of the amount of ALA is required to obtain the same plateau amount of photosensitiser from He-ALA. However, this plateau value cannot be surpassed in spite of the four-times higher accumulation of ALA/He-ALA from the ALA derivative. This shows that He-ALA conversion to porphyrins but not He-ALA entry to the cells is limiting. Employing ionic exchange chromatography, we found that 80% of total uptake was He-ALA whereas only 20% was ALA. This suggests that the esterases, probably themselves regulated by the heme pathway, are limiting the conversion of ALA derivatives into porphyrins. A similar situation occurs with THP-ALA. Tumour explant porphyrin results correlate well with cell line data. However, i.p. injection of ALA derivatives to mice resulted in a lower porphyrin concentration in the tumour when compared to the administration of equimolar amounts of ALA, indicating that there should be retention of ALA derivatives either within the blood vessels in the initial phase of distribution and/or within the capillaries of the tumour.

Aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been successfully employed in the treatment of certain tumours. Porphyrins endogenously generated from ALA induce tumour regression after illumination with light of an appropriate wavelength. The aim of this work was to compare porphyrin production from ALA and sensitivity to photodynamic treatment in a tumour/normal cell line pair. We employed the HB4a cell line from normal mammary luminal epithelium and its counterpart transfected with the oncogen H-Ras (VAL/12 Ras). After 3 h of exposure to ALA, HB4a-Ras cells produce a maximum of 150 ng porphyrins per 10(5) cells whereas HB4a produce 95 ng porphyrins per 10(5) cells. In addition, HB4a-Ras cells show a plateau of porphyrin synthesis at 1 mM whereas HB4a porphyrins peak at the same concentration, and then decrease quickly. This higher porphyrin synthesis in the tumorigenic cell line does not lead to a higher response to the photodynamic treatment upon illumination. Lethal doses 50, LD(50), determined by MTT assay were 0.015 J cm(-2) and 0.039 J cm(-2) for HB4a and HB4a-Ras respectively after 3 h exposure to 1 mM ALA. The conclusion of this work is that a tumour cell line obtained by transfection of the Ras oncogene, although producing higher porphyrin synthesis from ALA, is more resistant to ALA-PDT than the parental non-tumour line, however the mechanism is not related to photosensitiser accumulation, but very likely to cell survival responses.