A modified method to determine tear energy of impression materials is described. Trousers-shaped specimens were prepared between two platens. They are different from those used before in that a V-shaped line is created so as to guide tear growth, and the thickness gradually increases, then remains constant and, ultimately, decreases instantaneously. The specimens were tested at ten different rates between 0.2 and 50 cm/min. lambda can be computed from the force-time diagram. Six different materials were tested: two condensation silicones, Xantopren regular (Bayer, FRG) and Xantopren light; a polyvinylsiloxane, Reprosil regular (DeTrey, Switzerland); a polysulphide Coeflex regular (Coe, USA); a polyether, Impregum (Espe, FRG); and an alginate, Cavex, Fast Set, Dust Free (Keur & Sneltjes, The Netherlands). Tear strength (in kJ/m2) variations at rates between 0.2 and 50 cm/min are as follows: Xantopren regular, 0.37-0.64; Xantopren light, 0.29-0.46; Coeflex, 1.10-5.29; Reprosil, 0.66-1.07; Impregum, 0.62-1.04; Cavex, 0.22-0.37. These values are consistent with those reported before. It might be concluded that the new test method gives reliable tear energy values.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.