electronic medical records for each case and the time logs from both nursing and anesthesia. The patient's length of stay (registration to discharge from hospital), procedure time (time under anesthesia) and recovery time were analyzed for both groups. The presence of hematuria and need for a urinary catheter at time of discharge was also reviewed for both techniques. Results: A total of 50 consecutive cases for each technique were analyzed. The median ages for the two cohorts were similar, with 67 years (CT) and 64 years (US). Average total length of stay for patients undergoing CT based planning was 8.4 hours compared to US based planning of 6.6 hours. Procedures time for CT and US based planning was on average of 4.7AE1.1h vs. 2.9AE0.4h respectively. Recovery time was longer for CT based planning when compared to US based; 2.9AE1.9h vs 2.3AE.9h respectively. The percentage of patients with hematuria at discharge was 44% (22/50) for CT based planning and 14 % (7/50) for US based planning. The patients that required a urinary catheter at discharge was 26 % (13/50) using CT based planning and 4% (2/50) with US based planning. Conclusion: Procedure time and recovery time were both longer for CT based planning, directly influencing patients' lengths of stay. Contributing factors to the increased procedure time include patient transportation to CT scanner, administrating bladder contrast, scanning and reposition of needles due to transfer movement from table to stretcher to scanner. Longer periods of anesthesia can lead to multiple side effects and longer recovery time. With stepper-based template planning we found dramatic decreases in both incidence of hematuria and urinary catheter utilization. This overall increase in length of stay not only affects the efficiency in which hospital resources are used but also negatively impacts patients experience and overall satisfaction. More efficient and less traumatic treatment planning processes are crucial to the continuing success of HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.