The influence of various prostatic manipulations, including digital rectal examination, cystoscopy, transrectal ultrasonography and transrectal needle biopsy, on the serum prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) levels in 170 men, were examined. We found that digital rectal examination, cystoscopy and transrectal ultrasonography had no significant effect on PSA levels, except for transrectal needle biopsy, which caused an immediate increase of serum PSA in 96.2% of the patients lasting more than 2 weeks in 42.3% of the cases. In conclusion, serum PSA determination after digital rectal examination, after cystoscopy and after transrectal ultrasonography is accurate and reliable. On the other hand, we must wait about 6 weeks after needle biopsy before measuring PSA in the serum of patients with prostatic diseases.

The aim of this study was to determine the radiation doses to patients during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and compare them with the available bibliographical data. In this method localization of the renal stones is attained by the use of fluoroscopy, and thus ESWL is included among those medical practices associated with patient radiation exposure. The entrance surface dose was measured using 3-4 thermoluminescent dosimeters positioned on the patients' backs at the entrance surfaces of the two x-ray beams for 50 ESWL procedures. Fluoroscopy time and number of spot films were also recorded. The average entrance surface dose at the patient's side with the renal stone was estimated to be 76.5 mGy for the oblique x-ray beam and 44.5 mGy for the PA x-ray beam. The mean fluoroscopy time was 204 s while 4 spot films were acquired on average. The mean effective dose (E) was estimated as 1.63 mSv per patient. The mean entrance surface dose values recorded in this study are comparable to but smaller than the values reported in the literature for ESWL, while the mean fluoroscopy time is within the range of values reported by other authors. On the other hand, the estimated E value is relatively higher compared to the corresponding values given in the literature based on patient measurements. However, it is comparable to recent published data acquired using extended measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom.

In this study we treated 340 patients with renal and ureteric stones. They all underwent ESWL with the HM-4 lithotriptor. The patients were divided into two groups, the first one including 250 patients and the second 90. The first group consisted of patients with sterile urine prior to ESWL. These patients did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, while 5.2% of them developed infectious problems which were followed by significant bacteriuria in only 2% of the cases. The 90 patients of the second group had urinary tract infection on the preoperative cultures and received antibiotic treatment. Of these patients 27.8% developed infectious problems which were followed by significant bacteriuria in 21.1% of the cases. Evaluating the above results, we estimate that the administration of prophylactic antibiotics in the case of patients with sterile urine before ESWL is not required while it may prove to be useful in the case of patients with urinary tract infection prior to ESWL.

In this study, we treated patients with a solitary distal ureteral stone of less than 10 mm in maximum diameter by placing a double-pigtail stent and subsequently removing it allowing the calculus to pass spontaneously. A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the study with a mean stone size of 5.1 × 3.5 mm (range 2–8 mm in length and 2–7 mm in width). The indication for intervention was intractable pain in 5 patients, infection due to obstruction in 2, highly obstructed urinary tract in 10, absence of progression for 30 days in 21 and desire of the patient to be free of stone in 2. A double-pigtail stent was inserted in the involved ureter under local anesthesia and left in place for 2 weeks. After stent removal, 34 patients succeeded in passing the stone within an average time of 5.8 days. The overall success rate was 85%. We suggest this method as an alternative form of treatment for distal ureteral calculi to extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy or ureterolithotripsy under selected clinical circumstances.