We performed incubation experiments with 15 N-labeled nitrogen compounds to investigate the vertical distribution of pathways of N 2 production through the suboxic zone of the central Black Sea and the impact of oxygen and sulfide on the anammox process. Anammox rates increased with depth through the upper suboxic zone and reached a maximum of ,11 nmol N 2 L 21 d 21 at the sharp interface between nitrate and ammonium, below which rates decreased toward the depth of sulfide accumulation. Heterotrophic denitrification was not detected, and therefore anammox was the prevailing sink for fixed nitrogen in the central Black Sea. In incubations with low oxygen concentrations, anammox activity was only partially inhibited, with a decrease in anammox rates to ,70% and 50% of the anoxic level at ,3.5 and ,8 mmol L 21 O 2 , respectively, and complete inhibition at ,13.5 mmol L 21 O 2 . Thus, the anammox process is not constrained to anoxic marine waters. This increases the volume of the major open-ocean oxygen-deficient zones, where anammox is potentially active, which has important implications for the contribution of anammox to the marine nitrogen cycle. We observed an inhibitory effect of micromolar sulfide concentrations on anammox activity, indicating that the vertical and likely horizontal distribution of active anammox bacteria is constrained to nonsulfidic water layers, which may explain the absence of the process in sulfidic basins with no suboxic zone.The discovery of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) in wastewater treatment systems and natural aquatic environments resolved the mystery of ammonium deficiency in anoxic waters and challenged the preeminence of microbial denitrification as the only significant pathway for the removal of fixed nitrogen in the oceans (Devol 2003;Dalsgaard et al. 2005;Kuypers et al. 2006). Anaerobic ammonium oxidation with nitrite as an electron acceptor is mediated by a monophyletic group of bacteria that branches deeply in the phylum Planctomycetes (Strous et al. 1999;Schmid et al. 2003). The one-to-one coupling of nitrogen from ammonium and nitrite into gaseous N 2 , NH Graaf et al. 1995), distinguishes the anammox process from denitrification, where two molecules of nitrate are combined to N 2 in a stepwise pathway (2NOAlthough a number of studies demonstrate the importance of anammox bacteria in the biological nitrogen cycle (Dalsgaard et al. 2005;Kuypers et al. 2006;, little is known about the main factors that control the distribution and magnitude of the process. Expectedly, oxygen is such an important regulator. Experimental work with enrichments of anammox bacteria from laboratory wastewater bioreactors has shown that anammox activity is reversibly inhibited by oxygen levels as low as 1 mmol L 21 (Strous et al. 1997), indicating that the process is active only under strictly anoxic conditions. Still, in the Benguela upwelling system off Namibia, the observed dominance of anammox was suggested to result from anammox being less sensitive than denitrification tow...
Summary Emission of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) from freshwater and terrestrial invertebrates has exclusively been ascribed to N2O production by ingested denitrifying bacteria in the anoxic gut of the animals. Our study of marine molluscs now shows that also microbial biofilms on shell surfaces are important sites of N2O production. The shell biofilms of Mytilus edulis, Littorina littorea and Hinia reticulata contributed 18–94% to the total animal‐associated N2O emission. Nitrification and denitrification were equally important sources of N2O in shell biofilms as revealed by 15N‐stable isotope experiments with dissected shells. Microsensor measurements confirmed that both nitrification and denitrification can occur in shell biofilms due to a heterogeneous oxygen distribution. Accordingly, ammonium, nitrite and nitrate were important drivers of N2O production in the shell biofilm of the three mollusc species. Ammonium excretion by the animals was found to be sufficient to sustain N2O production in the shell biofilm. Apparently, the animals provide a nutrient‐enriched microenvironment that stimulates growth and N2O production of the shell biofilm. This animal‐induced stimulation was demonstrated in a long‐term microcosm experiment with the snail H. reticulata, where shell biofilms exhibited the highest N2O emission rates when the animal was still living inside the shell.
Members of the epsilonproteobacterial genus Arcobacter have been identified to be potentially important sulfide oxidizers in marine coastal, seep, and stratified basin environments. In the highly productive upwelling waters off the coast of Peru, Arcobacter cells comprised 3 to 25% of the total microbial community at a near-shore station where sulfide concentrations exceeded 20 μM in bottom waters. From the chemocline where the Arcobacter population exceeded 106 cells ml−1 and where high rates of denitrification (up to 6.5 ± 0.4 μM N day−1) and dark carbon fixation (2.8 ± 0.2 μM C day−1) were measured, we isolated a previously uncultivated Arcobacter species, Arcobacter peruensis sp. nov. (BCCM LMG-31510). Genomic analysis showed that A. peruensis possesses genes encoding sulfide oxidation and denitrification pathways but lacks the ability to fix CO2 via autotrophic carbon fixation pathways. Genes encoding transporters for organic carbon compounds, however, were present in the A. peruensis genome. Physiological experiments demonstrated that A. peruensis grew best on a mix of sulfide, nitrate, and acetate. Isotope labeling experiments further verified that A. peruensis completely reduced nitrate to N2 and assimilated acetate but did not fix CO2, thus coupling heterotrophic growth to sulfide oxidation and denitrification. Single-cell nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry analysis of samples taken from shipboard isotope labeling experiments also confirmed that the Arcobacter population in situ did not substantially fix CO2. The efficient growth yield associated with the chemolithoheterotrophic metabolism of A. peruensis may allow this Arcobacter species to rapidly bloom in eutrophic and sulfide-rich waters off the coast of Peru. IMPORTANCE Our multidisciplinary approach provides new insights into the ecophysiology of a newly isolated environmental Arcobacter species, as well as the physiological flexibility within the Arcobacter genus and sulfide-oxidizing, denitrifying microbial communities within oceanic oxygen minimum zones (OMZs). The chemolithoheterotrophic species Arcobacter peruensis may play a substantial role in the diverse consortium of bacteria that is capable of coupling denitrification and fixed nitrogen loss to sulfide oxidation in eutrophic, sulfidic coastal waters. With increasing anthropogenic pressures on coastal regions, e.g., eutrophication and deoxygenation (D. Breitburg, L. A. Levin, A. Oschlies, M. Grégoire, et al., Science 359:eaam7240, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7240), niches where sulfide-oxidizing, denitrifying heterotrophs such as A. peruensis thrive are likely to expand.
The Arabian Sea harbours one of the three major oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the world's oceans, and it alone is estimated to account for ~10–20 % of global oceanic nitrogen (N) loss. While actual rate measurements have been few, the consistently high accumulation of nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>) coinciding with suboxic conditions in the central-northeastern part of the Arabian Sea has led to the general belief that this is the region where active N-loss takes place. Most subsequent field studies on N-loss have thus been drawn almost exclusively to the central-NE. However, a recent study measured only low to undetectable N-loss activities in this region, compared to orders of magnitude higher rates measured towards the Omani Shelf where little NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulated (Jensen et al., 2011). In this paper, we further explore this discrepancy by comparing the NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-producing and consuming processes, and examining the relationship between the overall NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> balance and active N-loss in the Arabian Sea. Based on a combination of <sup>15</sup>N-incubation experiments, functional gene expression analyses, nutrient profiling and flux modeling, our results showed that NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulated in the central-NE Arabian Sea due to a net production via primarily active nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) reduction and to a certain extent ammonia oxidation. Meanwhile, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> consumption via anammox, denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate/nitrite reduction to ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) were hardly detectable in this region, though some loss to NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> oxidation was predicted from modeled NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> changes. No significant correlation was found between NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> and N-loss rates (<i>p</i>>0.05). This discrepancy between NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulation and lack of active N-loss in the central-NE Arabian Sea is best explained by the deficiency of labile organic matter that is directly needed for further NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> reduction to N<sub>2</sub>O, N<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and indirectly for the remineralized NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> required by anammox. Altogether, our data do not support the long-held view that NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulation is a direct activity indicator of N-loss in the Arabian Sea or other OMZs. Instead, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>&...
The Arabian Sea harbours one of the three major oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the world's oceans, and it alone is estimated to account for ~10–20% of global oceanic nitrogen (N) loss. While actual rate measurements have been few, the consistently high accumulation of nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>) coinciding with suboxic conditions in the central-northeastern part of the Arabian Sea has led to the general belief that this is the region where active N-loss takes place. Most subsequent field studies on N-loss have thus been drawn almost exclusively to the central-NE. However, a recent study measured only low to undetectable N-loss activities in this region, compared to orders of magnitude higher rates measured towards the Omani shelf where little NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulated (Jensen et al., 2011). In this paper, we further explore this discrepancy by comparing the NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> producing and consuming processes, and examining the relationship between the overall NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> balance and active N-loss in the Arabian Sea. Based on a combination of <sup>15</sup>N-incubation experiments, functional gene expression analyses, nutrient profiling and flux modeling, our results showed that NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulated in the Central-NE Arabian Sea due to a net production via primarily active nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) reduction and to a certain extent ammonia oxidation. Meanwhile, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> consumption via anammox, denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate/nitrite reduction to ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) were hardly detectable in this region, though some loss to NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> oxidation was predicted from modeled NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> changes. No significant correlation was found between NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> and N-loss rates (<i>p</i>>0.05). This discrepancy between NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulation and lack of active N-loss in the Central-NE Arabian Sea is best explained by the deficiency of organic matter that is directly needed for further NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> reduction to N<sub>2</sub>O, N<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and indirectly for the remineralized NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> required by anammox. Altogether, our data do not support the long-held view that NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> accumulation is a direct activity indicator of N-loss in the Arabian Sea or other OMZs. Instead, NO<sub>...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.