Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in incomplete spinal cord injured (SCI) subjects affected by neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms (NLUTS). Methods: Twenty-four SCI patients were enrolled. The individuals were divided into two groups: 13 individuals in the urinary retention category and 11 suffering from overactive bladder syndrome. All subjects underwent definitive SNM implantation (Medtronic, Inc.). Voiding symptoms were assessed using patient bladder diaries, which recorded both pre-SNM and before each follow-up (1, 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months). Outcome measures were per 24 h: number of voids and voided volume per void for both groups; number of urinary leakages, pad use and nocturia for patients with overactive bladder syndrome; and volume per catheterization and number of catheterizations for urinary retention subjects only. Final checkups were completed by June 2008. Results: Median follow-up was 61 months. Up to the final visit, all subjects maintained a clinical improvement of more than 50% compared with baseline. Twenty-two side effects were recorded. Four subjects with urinary retention needed a new implant in the controlateral S3 sacral root because of loss of efficacy. One patient with urinary retention developed a wound infection at the implanted pulse generator site. Conclusions: Our study contains the largest series of implanted SCI patients ever published. SNM is a therapy to consider in the treatment of NLUTS for partial SCI patients, even if the loss of clinical benefits for patients with retentive NLUTS must be taken into account. All adverse events were treated effectively.

Study design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in incomplete spinal cord-injured patients (SCIPs) affected by chronic neurogenic bowel symptoms (NBSs). Setting: Neurourology Department. Primary to tertiary care. Methods: Retrospective non-blinded study without controls. Thirty-nine SCIPs were submitted to temporary stimulation for NBS. Permanent implantation was carried out if both their NBSs improved and the Wexner questionnaire scores were reduced by at least 50% during the first stage compared with that at baseline. Outcome measures included episodes of fecal incontinence and number of evacuations per week, as well as the Wexner score and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire. Results: Twenty-three SCIPs were submitted to definitive SNM, maintaining their clinical benefits after permanent implantation with a median follow-up of 38 months. The length of time since neurological diagnosis to SNM therapy represents the only factor related to the success of the implantation, Po0.05. In subjects with constipation (12), the median number of evacuations shifted from 1.65 to 4.98 per week, whereas the Wexner score changed from 19.91 to 6.82 in the final checkup with Po0.05. In subjects with fecal incontinence (11), the median number of episodes per week in the final follow-up was 1.32 compared with 4.55 pre-SNM. The general and mental health of both groups was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire and consistently showed statistical improvement (Po0.05). Anorectal manometry showed no important variation compared with baseline. There were no major complications. Conclusions: SNM therapy should be considered for the treatment of NBS for select patients with incomplete spinal cord injury when conservative treatments fail.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intravesical electrostimulation (IVES) versus sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with incomplete spinal cord lesions (SCL) and neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention (N-NOR). Methods: In this retrospective study, 77 N-NOR patients underwent IVES (minimum 28 sessions), then after returning to voiding baseline symptoms, percutaneous first stage of SNM (lasting for minimum 4 weeks). After the two neuromodulation treatments, responders were categorized as patients experiencing both a 50% reduction of volume per catheterization per ml and a 50% reduction in number of catheterizations per day when comparing the 7-day voiding diaries at the end of both procedures to baselines. New urodynamics were performed subsequently. Responders to first stage of SNM underwent permanent SNM. Results: Forty-eight patients responded to neither of the treatments, whereas 29 responded to both IVES and first-stage SNM. No significant statistical differences (P40.05) were detected in the voiding diaries. Following the two procedures, the first sensation of bladder filling was either maintained or recovered by all responders, whereas the same 11 patients reached a bladder contractility index of 4100. The 29 IVES responders lost their clinical benefits in a mean follow-up of 9.6 months. Only 10 out of the 29 patients became nonresponsive to permanent SNM, in a mean follow-up of 54 months. Conclusion: A strict correlation in terms of clinical and urodynamic patterns was demonstrated in patients with incomplete SCL and N-NOR, following IVES and first stage of SNM. However, voiding improvement through IVES was short-term when compared with the effects of permanent SNM.

Objective: To determine the success rate of percutaneous first stage of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) and the efficacy and safety of permanent SNM for incomplete spinal cord lesion (SCL) patients suffering from chronic neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention (N-NOR). Method: From January 2003 to December 2012, 85 individuals underwent the percutaneous first stage of SNM. Subsequently, only responders who reached a concomitant reduction by at least 50% of volume per catheterization and in the number of catheterizations per day comparing their 7-day voiding diaries at baseline underwent permanent SNM. Final follow-up was conducted by April 2013. Results: Thirty-six individuals responded to percutaneous first stage of SNM. Post-surgery urodynamics documented all patients experiencing first sensation of bladder filling. A statistically significant increase in Qmax ml per sec and decrease in post-voiding residual urine per ml were documented. (Po0.01). First sensation of bladder filling at baseline represented a statistically significant parameter for the success of the first stage SNM (Po0.05). Eleven out of 34 patients at follow-ups were 'inconstant responders' because they returned to similar baseline voiding symptoms, but responded again with an implant on the controlateral S3 sacral root. Two failed twice and responded once again after an S4 sacral root implant. All but one failure occurred more than 3 years after the previous implant. Other drawbacks were resolved telemetrically. Keywords: neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention; sacral neuromodulation; aseptic intermittent catheterizations; urodynamics INTRODUCTION Neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention (N-NOR) due to spinal cord lesion (SCL) may be treated with pelvic floor reeducation, or drugs such as alpha-blockers and parasympathomimetics, though these therapies are commonly unsuccessful. 1,2 Moreover, literature reports that with intravesical electrostimulation patients regained detrusor activity and increased awareness of bladder filling. 3,4 However, other authors show negative findings. 5,6 A recent review on the use of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction reports that no definitive conclusions can be drawn from the available evidence regarding this procedure for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. 7 The aim of this retrospective study is to address the success rate percentage of first stage SNM in individuals with an incomplete SCL. Moreover, medium-and long-term efficacy associated with the safety of permanent SNM on SCL subjects suffering from N-NOR were evaluated.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and urodynamic impact of intravesical electrostimulation (IVES) on incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) patients suffering from chronic neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention (N-NOR). Methods: One-hundred and two patients underwent at least 28 consecutive daily IVES sessions because objective evidence of detrusor acontractility instead of hypocontractility was detected. Diary entries written at various stages by each patient were compared (7 days before the IVES cycle, 15-21 days into the cycle and 7 days before its end). Responders were patients with a mean 50% reduction in both the number of daily catheterizations and post-void residual urine. Responders underwent further urodynamics at the end of the IVES cycle; patients experiencing first sensation of bladder filling, and the mean volume of first sensation of bladder filling per ml, Qmax ml s À1 , among others, were evaluated. Nineteen individuals who repeated another IVES round were included in this study.Results: Thirty-eight subjects (37.2%) responded to IVES and of those, 83.3% recovered the first sensation of bladder filling after the IVES round. Nineteen responders repeated IVES within 1 year, owing to loss of efficacy. They obtained similar voiding symptoms improvement and urodynamic results as after the first IVES cycle. A timespan of o2 years from SCI to IVES, and the presence of first sensation of bladder filling at baseline represented significant predictive parameters for IVES success (Po0.05) using w 2 -test. Conclusions: IVES represents a possible therapeutic option for incomplete SCI patients with N-NOR.