Summary 20-40% of cancer patients show emotional distress. Psychosocial support should be offered to severely distressed patients. However, little is known about the selection of patients to whom such support should be offered. This study investigated oncologists' ability to identify such patients. In a consecutive series of 298 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, distress, perceived social support and desire for supportive counselling were assessed using screening instruments. Simultaneously, 8 oncologists estimated patient distress and need for psychosocial support. A complete set of data was obtained in 80.2% of cases. Concordance of the oncologists' estimation of patient distress and perceived social support with the results of the screening instruments was weak (κ = 0.10 and κ = 0.05). Oncologists recognized the presence of severe distress only in 11 of the 30 severely distressed patients. Correct perception of distress was lower in patients with head and neck cancer and lung cancer and in lower class patients. Oncologists' recommendations for supportive counselling did not correlate with patient distress or the amount of perceived support but rather with progressive disease and less denial behaviour. Our results underline the need for educating oncologists in order to improve their ability to identify patient distress.

The incidence of distant metastasis in head and neck cancer and especially in salivary gland cancer is relatively low in comparison to other malignancies. However, the presence of distant metastasis heralds a poor prognosis in head and neck cancer, with a median survival of 4.3-7.3 months. Treatment of these patients is usually performed in a palliative setting. Patients with malignant salivary gland tumors should have an X-ray or CT scan of the chest at their initial assessment to exclude the possibility of distant metastasis. The likelihood of developing distant metastasis is associated with high-grade tumors, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma and tumors located in the submandibular gland, posterior tongue and pharyngeal tumors. A lower risk of developing distant metastasis is known for all other histological entities of salivary gland tumors. Nevertheless all patients who have a histologically confirmed malignant salivary gland tumor should have lifelong follow-up. On the basis of a clinical case regarding a patient with metastatic parotid gland cancer we present a review of the literature.

Adenotonsillectomy is a highly effective approach to treat children with tonsil disease. It has a positive impact on children's HRQL and other areas not directly associated with their tonsil disease. Moreover, this improvement in HRQL is durable and not temporary.

Prominent ears are relatively frequent. Decreased self-esteem, increased anxiety, behavioral problems and social avoidance may result from disfigurement. In modern medicine it is becoming increasingly important to measure the benefit of surgical intervention by its impact on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL). Our study was performed in a retrospective manner at our institution including 40 adult patients with prominent ears. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), a reproducible, valid and responsive questionnaire, was the basis of the used inquiry for detecting the changes in HRQOL after otoplasty. We showed an improvement in GBI subscores after intervention. There was no difference in GBI subscores between men and women. The follow-up time as well as critical life event and chronic concomitant disease have no influence on the GBI results. Otoplasty has a positive impact on the HRQOL of adult patients with prominent ears. The importance of this benefit is not only of individual nature. In times of healthcare economization, an amelioration of QOL followed by increased productivity at work of the individual is an important argument to justify health care expenditures. We believe that otoplasty is an appropriate therapy for selected adult patients burdened by prominent ears.

In all, 285 patients (47.5%) responded. Analysis of the questionnaire showed an improvement in all disease-specific subgroups.