Although metastasis is a frequent event in breast cancer patients, insight into the clinical course, prognosis and therapy with respect to the site of the first metastases has been poor and contradictory in former investigations. Follow-up data from 648 patients with metastatic breast cancer were statistically analyzed. Patients with bone metastases at first relapse had better overall survival (median 71 vs. 48 months; p < 0.001) and survival after first metastases (median 24 vs 12 months; p < 0.001) than patients with visceral metastases at first relapse. Bone was the site of first metastasis in 46%, and 71% of patients with metastatic breast cancer developed bone metastases. The localization of the second metastatic site was of prognostic relevance in patients with first visceral metastases, but not in patients with first bone metastases. The presence of osseous metastases correlated significantly with estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity, tumor grading I/II and S-phase fraction <5%. The better prognosis of patients with bone metastases is not determined exclusively by hormone receptor status. The disease is significantly more stable in patients with first bone metastases than in those with first visceral metastases.
SummaryPatients with an elevated level of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) in breast cancer tissue have an adverse prognosis. This study evaluated the prognostic relevance of uPA detection in disseminated tumour cells in bone marrow. Bone marrow was sampled intraoperatively from both iliac crests in 280 patients with primary breast cancer. Interphase cells were enhanced and stained immunocytologically with two antibodies: 2E11, which detects TAG 12 -a tumour-associated glycoprotein typically expressed by almost all breast cancer cells -and the anti-uPA antibody HD-UK9. Thirty-five of the 2E1 1-positive women (n = 132, 47%) developed metastatic disease (median follow-up time 44 months). Of these, most were uPA positive (n = 23, 65%) and only 12 were uPA negative. Patients with uPApositive cells in bone marrow (n = 98, 35%) had a significantly shorter metastasis-free interval (36 months) than women who were uPA negative (44.5 months). The worst prognosis was seen in patients positive for both markers (29.5 months), followed by those who were uPA negative and 2E11 positive (37 months). The detection of uPA on disseminated tumour cells characterizes a subgroup of patients with an even worse prognosis, who should undergo more aggressive adjuvant systemic therapy. For the first time, it was possible to evaluate an important qualitative parameter involved in the process of breast cancer metastases.
Differentiating between several degrees of pathology is important for the estimation of fetal risk. In cases of pathological Doppler findings, the measurement of more than two vessels is important in order to select fetuses at increased risk.
This study was performed to analyze the relevance of iliac crest biopsy in patients with primary breast cancer with regard to metastases of the primary tumor and osteogenic disease. We performed intraoperative bilateral biopsy of the anterior iliac crests in 1465 patients with primary breast cancer. The bone specimens were histologically evaluated with regard to quality of the biopsy, tumor involvement, and osteogenic and hematogenic disease. Accurate and clear evaluation of the iliac crest biopsies was possible in 1365 patients (93%). Osteopenia was diagnosed in 48 patients (3.5%); 24 patients (1.7%) showed histological evidence of tumor involvement of the skeletal system. All these 24 patients received systemic (adjuvant) therapy after surgery. Ten patients had micrometastases, although in 5 of them both the postoperative bone scan and X-rays showed no pathological results. In 10 women with histologically negative bone biopsies, metastases to the bone were diagnosed by bone scan and radiological methods. Random perioperative iliac bone biopsy cannot be recommended in patients with primary breast cancer. Iliac crest biopsy is relevant in certain scenarios (e.g. suspected recurrence, doubtful bone scan).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.