Summary:Purpose:More than 20% of epilepsy patients have refractory seizures. Treatment options for these patients include continued polytherapy with/without novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), epilepsy surgery (ES), or vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). The purpose of this study was prospectively to compare epilepsy-related direct medical costs (ERDMCs) incurred by these different treatment modalities.Methods: Eighty-four patients underwent a complete presurgical evaluation protocol at our institution. As a result, 24 (29%) patients were treated with continued AED polytherapy only; 35 (40%) underwent ES; and 25 (30%) had VNS. In each patient, annual costs in the 2 years preceding the therapeutic decision (ERDMC-pre) and during the follow-up afterward (ERDMC-post) were prospectively calculated. Furthermore, frequency of complex partial seizures with/without secondary generalization (CPS±SG), dosage and number of AEDs, number of hospital admission days, clinic visits, and laboratory tests before and after the therapeutic decision also were prospectively assessed. ERDMC-pre and ERDMC-post were compared in and among the three treatment groups.Results: In patients conservatively treated with AEDs, mean frequency of CPSs decreased from 12 per month to nine per month, whereas mean ERDMCs decreased from $2,525 U.S. to $2,421 U.S. In surgical patients, mean seizure frequency decreased from six to fewer than one per month; mean ERDMCs per year decreased from $1,465 U.S. preoperatively to $1,186 U.S. postoperatively. In the VNS group, mean seizure frequency decreased from 21 per month to seven per month. ERDMCs in this subgroup decreased from $4,826 U.S. to $2,496 U.S. Mean seizure frequency changes were significant when conservatively treated patients were compared with surgically treated and VNS patient groups ( 2 test, p<0.001 and p ס 0.0019, respectively). ERDMC changes in conservatively treated patients also were statistically significant when compared with surgically treated and VNS patients ( 2 test, p ס 0.0007 and p ס 0.0036, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found in ERDMC changes between the surgical and VNS groups ( 2 test, p ס 0.387). Conclusions: Ongoing daily treatment of patients who underwent resective surgery costs significantly less than conservative treatment. For patients in whom resective surgery is not an option, ERDMC show a significant decrease in VNS-treated patients compared with conservatively treated patients.
VNS is an effective treatment of refractory epilepsy and remains effective during long-term follow-up. Cost-benefit analysis suggests that the cost of VNS is saved within two years following implantation.
Between 1991 and 2000, seven patients presented with symptomatic pineal cysts at our hospital (6 females, 1 male). Average age was 22 years (range 4-33 years). Headache was present in 6 patients, who were subsequently operated on. A scotoma and a transient inferior visual field deficit were minor signs in two patients respectively. A Parinaud syndrome with vertical gaze paralysis was found in none. In one child, paroxysmal pupillary dilatations and contractions ('springing pupils') constituted the only signs and a conservative policy was adopted. Four patients presented with hydrocephalus and were treated by an endoscopic resection of their pineal cysts (one stereotactically, three free-hand). Two other patients presented with a prolonged history of symptoms and signs: headache alone in one, headache with discrete neurological deficits in the other. Ventricles in these two patients were not dilated and therefore an open cyst resection by infratentorial supracerebellar approach was performed. Average follow-up in the six "operated" patients was 29 months (range 12-108 months). All four patients treated by endoscopy, are symptom-free at follow-up, whereas the two who were approached by open surgery, are not. Clinical presentation, radiological evaluation and treatment modalities of pineal cysts are discussed and compared with experiences reported in the literature. It is concluded that pineal cysts in the presence of obstructive hydrocephalus are a clear indication for endoscopy with a rigid endoscope.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.