Zolpidem is a short-acting imidazopyridine hypnotic that is an agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid A type (GABAA) receptor. It has been suggested that it acts selectively on alpha1 subunit-containing GABAA benzodiazepine (BZ1) receptors presenting (contrary to classic benzodiazepines) low or no affinity for other subtypes. Therefore, it has been proposed that it lacks the benzodiazepines-like side-effects, having minimal abuse and dependence potential. Nevertheless, there is a considerable number of zolpidem dependence case reports in the literature. We present eight cases of zolpidem abuse and dependence without criminal record, without history of substance abuse (except for one alcohol abuser), with minor psychiatric disorders, who took zolpidem after physicians prescription in order to deal with their insomnia. However, they became zolpidem abusers not craving its sedative, but its anxiolytic and stimulating action, which helped them to cope with everyday activities. It is possible that, in the high doses that our patients used, zolpidem abandons its selectivity for BZ1 receptors and demonstrates all the actions of classic benzodiazepines. Molecular biology, via possible mutations on GABA receptors, may provide some answers as to why our eight patients (who did not differ much from the thousands of insomniacs who use zolpidem) and other zolpidem abusers, raised the dose progressively, and sought something from the drug other than hypnotic action.

We investigated the factorial composition as well as the demographic, anamnestic and clinical correlates of 13 features of delusional beliefs in a sample of 127 psychiatric inpatients with active delusions at the time of their assessment: Six factors were extracted, jointly accounting for 67.3% of the variance, which were interpreted as the dimensions of cognitive disintegration, volitional dyscontrol, doxastic strength, distress, incongruence and expansiveness, respectively. Moreover, most factors exhibited distinctive profiles of demographic, anamnestic or clinical correlates. Overall, our findings provide supportive evidence for both the clinical multidimensionality of delusional beliefs at the factor-analytic level and the – at least partial – external validity of the factorial solution obtained.

We previously reported an association between the functional polymorphism in the upstream regulatory region of the serotonin transporter gene (SERTPR) and the prophylactic efficacy of lithium in a sample of 201 Italian subjects affected by Mood disorders. The aim of the present study was to replicate analyses on an independent sample. In total, 83 subjects affected by Bipolar disorder were recruited in the Mood Disorders Clinic of the Eginition Hospital of the Athens University, Medical School Department of Psychiatry. All patients were administered with lithium as prophylactic therapy and they were prospectively observed for at least 3 years. Subjects were typed for their SERTPR variant using polymerase chain reaction techniques. SERTPR variants were associated with lithium outcome among those subjects who had few manic episodes before lithium treatment and, as a trend, among subjects who received a high daily dose of lithium (X1200 mg/die). In both cases, subjects with the l/l variant showed a higher probability to develop an illness episode within 3 years of prophylactic treatment with lithium. The present study confirmed our previous observation of a better response of SERTPR*l/s carriers, but could not confirm a poor efficacy in subjects with the SERTPR*s/s genotype. Notwithstanding the conflicting results, SERTPR variants are a possible liability factor for lithium long-term efficacy in mood disorders. Further studies on independent and large samples are required to determine the reliability and direction of the possible association between SERTPR variants and lithium outcome. INTRODUCTIONLithium is an effective prophylactic agent in mood disorders but not all patients equally respond to lithium therapy. Clinical predictors account for less than half of the variance, 1-8 and there are evidences suggesting that genetic factors play a substantial role in lithium prophylaxis effectiveness. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] A large number of studies reported an association between prophylactic lithium response and a family history of bipolar disorder, 10,[12][13][14]17 although not unequivocally confirmed. [21][22][23][24][25] Recently, Grof et al 26 reported that lithium response in a sample of relatives of responder probands was 67% compared to 30% in the comparison group.

No abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine whether a combined psychotherapeutic-psychopharmacological (with mirtazapine) treatment of collateral anxiety and depressive symptomatology during the post-withdrawal phase of alcoholism facilitates the process of alcohol detoxification, which is a decisive stage in the treatment of alcohol-dependent individuals. For that purpose, the rate of remission of anxiety and depressive symptoms over a 4-week detoxification period was evaluated between two groups: the first group followed a standard detoxification protocol (n = 33) and the second group was assigned to mirtazapine in addition to standard treatment (n= 35). A marked reduction of anxiety and depressive symptoms was demonstrated in both groups. However, patients on mirtazapine improved more and at a faster rate compared to controls. Thus, mirtazapine, used adjunctively to short-term psychotherapy, may help the detoxification process by minimizing physical and subjective discomfort. Consequently, it may improve patient compliance in alcohol detoxification programs and facilitate the initial phase treatment of alcohol abuse dependence.