Adipocytes are the primary cells in the body that store excess energy as triglycerides. To perform this specialized function, adipocytes rely on their mitochondria; however, the role of adipocyte mitochondria in the regulation of adipose tissue homeostasis and its impact on metabolic regulation is not understood. We developed a transgenic mouse model, Mito-Ob, overexpressing prohibitin (PHB) in adipocytes. Mito-Ob mice developed obesity due to upregulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in adipocytes. Of note, Mito-Ob female mice developed more visceral fat than male mice. However, female mice exhibited no change in glucose homeostasis and had normal insulin and high adiponectin levels, whereas male mice had impaired glucose homeostasis, compromised brown adipose tissue structure, and high insulin and low adiponectin levels. Mechanistically, we found that PHB overexpression enhances the cross talk between the mitochondria and the nucleus and facilitates mitochondrial biogenesis. The data suggest a critical role of PHB and adipocyte mitochondria in adipose tissue homeostasis and reveal sex differences in the effect of PHB-induced adipocyte mitochondrial remodeling on whole-body metabolism. Targeting adipocyte mitochondria may provide new therapeutic opportunities for the treatment of obesity, a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes.

A critical unmet need for the study of obesity-linked cancer is the lack of preclinical models that spontaneously develop obesity and cancer sequentially. Prohibitin (PHB) is a pleiotropic protein that has a role in adipose and immune functions. We capitalized on this attribute of PHB to develop a mouse model for obesity-linked tumor. We achieved this by expressing Y114F-PHB (m-PHB) from the aP2 gene promoter for simultaneous manipulation of adipogenic and immune signaling functions. The m-PHB mice develop obesity in a sex-neutral manner, but only male mice develop impaired glucose homeostasis and hyperinsulinemia similar to transgenic mice expressing PHB. Interestingly, only male m-PHB mice develop histiocytosis with lymphadenopathy, suggesting that metabolic dysregulation or m-PHB alone is not sufficient for the tumor development and that both are required for tumorigenesis. Moreover, ovariectomy in female m-PHB mice resulted in impaired glucose homeostasis, hyperinsulinemia and consequently tumor development similar to male m-PHB mice. These changes were not observed in sham-operated control m-Mito-Ob mice, further confirming the role of obesity-related metabolic dysregulation in tumor development in m-PHB mice. Our data provide a proof-of-concept that obesity-associated hyperinsulinemia promotes tumor development by facilitating dormant mutant to manifest and reveals a sex-dimorphic role of PHB in adipose-immune interaction or immunometabolism. Targeting PHB may provide a unique opportunity for the modulation of immunometabolism in obesity, cancer and in immune diseases.

Guanine quadruplexes (G4s) are four-stranded secondary structures of nucleic acids which are stabilized by noncanonical hydrogen bonding systems between the nitrogenous bases as well as extensive base stacking, or pi-pi, interactions. Formation of these structures in either genomic DNA or cellular RNA has the potential to affect cell biology in many facets including telomere maintenance, transcription, alternate splicing, and translation. Consequently, G4s have become therapeutic targets and several small molecule compounds have been developed which can bind such structures, yet little is known about how G4s interact with their native protein binding partners. This review focuses on the recognition of G4s by proteins and small peptides, comparing the modes of recognition that have thus far been observed. Emphasis will be placed on the information that has been gained through high-resolution crystallographic and NMR structures of G4/peptide complexes as well as biochemical investigations of binding specificity. By understanding the molecular features that lead to specificity of G4 binding by native proteins, we will be better equipped to target protein/G4 interactions for therapeutic purposes.

Background: Viral scaffolding proteins interact with coat proteins to drive procapsid assembly. Results: Amino acid substitutions in the turn and between the helices of the coat protein-binding domain of scaffolding protein block procapsid assembly. Conclusion:The orientation of helices in the scaffolding helix turn helix domain is critical for procapsid assembly. Significance: Understanding scaffolding/coat protein interactions illuminates the mechanism of assembly of many large viruses.

Many prokaryotic and eukaryotic dsDNA viruses use a scaffolding protein to assemble their capsid. Assembly of the dsDNA bacteriophage P22 procapsids requires the interaction of 415 molecules of coat protein and 60–300 molecules of scaffolding protein. Although the 303 amino acid scaffolding protein is essential for proper assembly of procapsids, little is known about its structure beyond an NMR structure of the extreme C-terminus, which is known to interact with coat protein. Deletion mutagenesis indicates that other regions of scaffolding protein are involved in interactions with coat protein and other capsid proteins. Single and double cysteine variants of scaffolding protein were generated for use in fluorescence resonance energy transfer and crosslinking experiments designed to probe the conformation of scaffolding protein in solution and within procapsids. We showed that the N- and C-termini are proximate in solution and that the middle of the protein is near the N-terminus but not accessible to the C-terminus. In procapsids, the N-terminus was no longer accessible to the C-terminus, which indicated that there is a conformational change in scaffolding protein upon assembly. In addition, our data are consistent with a model where scaffolding protein dimers are positioned parallel to one another with associated C-termini.