The ERAS programme developed is now embedded in the care pathway for people undergoing head and neck cancer surgery in our unit. The mean length of hospital stay has reduced since the introduction of the programme.

Thyroidectomy has few complications, as a result, many patients are concerned about the prominence of their scar. Performing thyroid surgery through excessively small incisions in order to maximise cosmesis may increase the likelihood of complications. This study investigates the relationship between conventional approach thyroidectomy scar length and patient satisfaction. A validation of self-measurement of neck circumference and thyroidectomy scar was carried out with the measurements taken by patients compared with those taken by an investigator. One hundred consecutive patients who had undergone conventional thyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy within 24 months were invited to measure their scars and neck circumference, and to score their satisfaction on a Likert scale of 1-10. Spearman's correlation was calculated for the relationship between absolute and relative scar length, and patient satisfaction. Thirty-four patients entered the preliminary study and 80 patients entered the main study (80% response rate). Measurements by patients and investigators were closely associated: Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient for neck circumference and for scar length were ρ = 0.9, p < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.93, p < 0.0001 respectively. No significant correlation was evident between scar length and patient satisfaction (ρ = 0.068, p = 0.55), or between relative scar length ratio and patient satisfaction (ρ = -0.045, p = 0.69). Mean scar length was 6.96 cm [standard deviation (SD) 2.70], and mean satisfaction score 8.62 (SD 2.04). Thyroidectomy scar length appears to have no association with patient satisfaction. Thyroid surgery should, therefore, not be performed through unnecessarily small incisions for purely aesthetic reasons.

No abstract

Referrals for epistaxis management constitute a significant proportion of paediatric ENT consultations. A prospective audit of all new referrals to our paediatric ENT department for epistaxis management yielded 88 patients over four months. Parents completed a questionnaire with particular reference to the duration of history and frequency of epistaxis. After assessment some patients were given topical chlorhexidine and neomycin cream (Naseptin), in addition some children also underwent chemical cautery (silver nitrate). Of the 64 children in whom out-patient nasal cautery was attempted it was tolerated by 63 (98 per cent). In response to a follow-up postal questionnaire returned by 65 per cent, most parents (74 per cent) felt that Naseptin was useful. A telephone survey of the patients' general practitioners found that 91 per cent of the children did not consult their general practitioner regarding epistaxis again. We conclude that paediatric epistaxis can be effectively managed with a single out-patient consultation.

Silicone lymphadenopathy following breast augmentation primarily affects the axillary nodes. Supraclavicular lymph node involvement is unusual. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the English language literature of silicone lymphadenopathy manifesting solely in the supraclavicular lymph nodes. Although the need to exclude malignancy in such cases is of the utmost importance, silicone lymphadenopathy should also be considered in the differential diagnosis. Fine needle aspiration cytology is a useful initial investigation, which may be followed up by excisional biopsy and histological analysis for further confirmatory diagnostic information.