Background: Post-operative sore throat (POST) is a frequent complaint that occurs in 21-65% of patients receiving general anesthesia (GA) with endotracheal intubation. Effective prevention of postoperative sore throat is thus needed. The inhaled corticosteroids deliver the drug to the site of action without systemic effects. Dexamethasone is a potent synthetic glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory effects.
Introduction Research on adequate postoperative pain management is a current trend in post-anesthetic and surgical areas. Patient satisfaction is a parameter of medical quality. High pain scores increase the incidence of post-operative morbidity and lead to delayed recovery, prolonged hospital stay and increased healthcare costs.1 Bariatric Surgeries are surgeries performed for morbid obese patient to reduce patient’s weight through several methods and because morbid obese patients are at higher risk of complications after surgery2, Pain control during bariatric surgery is a major challenge3. Opioids play an important role in anesthesia practice; however, related complications like; sedation, airway obstruction, and respiratory depression are of concern in morbid obese patients .Therefore, opioids should be used sparingly. And newly safe methods better to be used for better perioperative pain control in bariatric surgeries. Objective To cover the gab of knowledge regarding the evidence of the safest and most efficient method to control perioperative pain in bariatric surgeries by reviewing the literature about this evidence through comparative systematic review study. Methodology Systematic review study discussed the results of 30 studies found in the literature related to perioperative pain control in bariatric surgeries according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria . Results and Discussion 30 different studies were discussed about the different methods of anesthesia in bariatric surgeries 6 of them about Transverses abdominis plane. ‘TAP’ block, 5 about Local anesthesia, 4 about Dexmedetomidine, 3 about spinal morphine, 3 about multi modal analgesia, 2 about preoperative medication, 2 about patient controlled analgesia ‘PCA', 1 about continuous infusion catheter, 1 about ibuprofen, 1 about Pulmonary recruitment maneuver, 1 about Sugammadex and 1 about non opioid anesthesia). Results are recorded about the efficacy of each method through the outcome measures. Conclusion It's found that the most effective method is multi modal analgesia represented in preoperative ultra sound guided TAP block, intraoperative port- sites and intraperitoneal infiltration with local anesthesia then recovery by sugammadex followed by postoperative IVI acetaminophen and PCA. Using preoperative clonidine, ketamine, pregabalin, epidural analgesia and pulmonary recruitment maneuver at the end of the surgery are also with low complication. Continuous infusion catheter, IV Ibuprofen, combined Dexmedetomidine and Acetaminophene, preoperative port-site infiltration and post operative intraperitoneal local anesthetic have no evidence based efficacy right now and it needs further studies.
Background Lower limb orthopedic surguries are one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the pediatric population. Using optimal analgesic regimen provide safe and effective analgesia, reduce postoperative stress response and accelerate recovery from surgery. Regional anesthetic techniques are commonly used to facilitate pain control in pediatric surgical procedures. The most commonly used techniques in pediatrics is caudal block. Aim of the Work This study is conducted to evaluate the analgesic effect of dexamethasone when given systemically versus caudally as an adjuvant to caudal block for children undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries. Patients and Methods The study was conducted on 50 randomly chosen patients in Ain Shams University Hospitals after approval of the medical ethical committee. Patients were divided randomly into two groups, each group consisted of 25 patients. Results The results of the study revealed that dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg, when used as an adjuvant to caudal anesthesia, can significantly prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia. It is better than IV dexamethasone at similar doses in controlling postoperative pain. Conclusion From our study, we can conclude that dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg, when used as an adjuvant to caudal anesthesia, can significantly prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia. It is better than IV dexamethasone at similar doses in controlling postoperative pain.
Background Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a preventable ano treatable oisease with some sienificant extra pulmonary effects that may contribute to the severity in inoivioual patients. Its pulmonary component is characterizeo by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The airflow limitation is usually proeressive ano is associateo with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lune to noxious particles or eases. Aim of the Work to evaluate the effect of hypophosphatemia on patients with acute exacerbation of COPD reearoine severity of COPD exacerbation, neeo for ventilation, ouration of ventilation ano outcome. Patients and Methods This observational stuoy was performeo on 50 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were aomitteo to intensive care oepartment of Ain Shams University. Serum of phosphorus was measureo on aomission, hypophosphatemia is consioereo if serum phosphorus is below 2.5me/ol. In our stuoy 32 patients hao hypophosphatemia ano 18 patients hao normal phosphorus levels out of the 50 patients in our stuoy. Results Severity of COPD exacerbation ano ventilation necessity increaseo in males with olo aee who were heavy smokers with lone ouration of smokine. Hieh levels of PaCO2 increaseo the neeo for ventilation. Hypophosphatemia without other electrolytes oeficiency increaseo severity of COPD exacerbation, also it increaseo neeo for ventilation. Also our results showeo that hypophosphatemia associateo with lone ouration of ventilation, poor outcome ano hieh rate of mortality as it causeo oiaphraematic ano respiratory muscle weakness so it leo to weanine failure ano so oeath. Combineo hypophosphatemia with multiple electrolytes oeficiency increaseo neeo for ventilation, ouration of ventilation ano poor outcome, while multiple electrolytes oeficiency without hypophosphatemia hao no effect on neeo for ventilation, ouration of ventilation ano outcome. We coulon't comment on hypomaenesemia oue to small number of patients as only one patient hao hypomaenesemia in our stuoy. Therefore, low blooo phosphorus levels contributes to increase severity of COPD, neeo for ventilation, ouration of ventilation ano poor outcome, so correction of hypophosphatemia may improve proenosis of COPD exacerbation. Conclusion Hypophosphatemia increases the severity of COPD exacerbation, neeo for ventilation, ouration of ventilation, weanine failure ano so increases the rate of mortality. Also, combineo hypophosphatemia with multiple electrolytes oeficiency increaseo neeo for ventilation.
Background A burn is a thermal injury caused by biological, chemical, electrical and physical agents with local and systemic repercussions. There are several ways of classifying burns: Classification by mechanism or cause, Classification by the degree and depth of a burn, Classification by extent of burn the extent of burn. Objectives The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of using recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in the treatment of pediatric burn victims and their ICU length of stay, mortality and morbidity. Patients and Methods This study was an Interventional randomized controlled Double Blind Study in which Patients subdivided randomly into 2 groups: Group A received somatotropine hormone after their 3 days of resuscitation besides their conventional treatment during their stay in the Burn ICU. Group B received the conventional treatment only in the Burn ICU. Results The comparison between the GH group and the control group showed that the mean ICU stay in days in GH group was 10.88 while in the control group 13.59 with P value 0.018 as a significant result as the GH group showed a less ICU stay time than the control group with approximately 20%. Mortality in the GH group was 6.2% from the total number of the group while in control group 18.8% from the total number of the group with P value 0.033 as a significant result yet the mortality may also depend on other factors as the degree of burn and the area of burn and the associated events like inhalational injury or delay post burn or any other co-morbidity. Morbidity results seen was 0% in control group and 4.7% in GH group with P value 0.080 as a non-significant result, morbidity was in the form of hyperglycemia. Conclusion The use of recombinant Growth hormone with a dose of 0.2 mg/Kg SQ 2 days per week with 3 days time interval in pediatric burn patients after their primary resuscitation from the burn injury, shows a marvelous improvement concerning the ICU stay time as the patient received the growth hormone showed an approximately 20% time less ICU stay than the control group this may be accounted for the faster wound healing and readiness for grafting and even faster graft healing, also a decreased mortality in a significant way, although mortality may depend on many factors in burn patients like degree of burn and the area of burn and the associated events like inhalational injury or any other co-morbidity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.