In order to investigate the cytokinetics of malignant tumors and non-malignant lesions of the lung, tissue samples from 57 patients affected by non-small-cell carcinoma (NSCLC), small-cell carcinoma (SCLC), and benign and inflammatory lesions have been analyzed using the BUdR monoclonal antibody (MAb) method. This method is based on the preparation, at the time of surgery, of viable monocellular suspensions (using collagenase and DNase treatment) and the concomitant administration of BudR. The percentage of BudR-labelled cells was monitored by fluorescent microscopy using an FITC-labelled second antibody. In NSCLC, each histological group showed a wide range of labelling index (LI) values. On the contrary, SCLC exhibited a more homogeneous kinetic behaviour as evidenced by a narrowly distributed, higher LI. Tumors shown to be diploid by flow cytometry did not show a lower LI than aneuploid tumors. Furthermore, differences were constantly observed between the S-phase percent calculated using BUdR and that calculated using the DNA flow cytometric (FC) histogram, the latter always showing higher S-phase values. In an attempt to study the intra-tumor proliferative heterogeneity, multiple-site sampling was performed. Proliferative heterogeneity seemed to be higher inter-tumor than intra-tumor. Finally, a positive correlation (p less than 0.05) was found between LI and the actual doubling time (DT) of the primary tumor mass, evaluated using sequential radiographs. In conclusion, the present BUdR method can be considered a useful source of relevant information on in vivo cell growth, in parallel to other clinical (DT) and biological (DNA content) approaches.
With the aim of distinguishing neoplastic cell sub-populations of different prognostic and diagnostic significance, dual-parameter measurements (DNA/protein) have been simultaneously determined in a (256, 256) channel matrix in lung samples derived from 110 patients affected by neoplastic and non-neoplastic lung diseases. Biparametric analysis demonstrated that cells with abnormally high red fluorescence (i.e., protein content), which is indicative of unbalanced growth, were often observed in malignant tumors as compared with normal lung samples. Furthermore, the dual-parameter analysis allowed recognition of additional aneuploid tumor-cell lines, indicating that the frequency of cytometrically determined diploid tumor is lower than that previously described by DNA monoparametric analysis. The recognition of aneuploid subpopulations by dual-parameter analysis in clinically and histologically negative one-parameter flow-cytometric "diploid" samples assumes important diagnostic value. The results have also shown the presence of multiple protein sub-populations in clones with the same ploidy value, indicating a higher level of cellular heterogeneity than demonstrated by DNA monoparametric measurements.
Six cell lines were derived from pleural effusions of two lung cancer patients and established in vitro in our laboratory. Cell line AE1 was obtained from a small cell lung cancer (SCLC) before the patient had received any chemotherapy; the other lines (AE2 and AE3) were established from tumour recurrences in the same patient after therapy. Cell lines DG1 and DG2 were derived from specimens of an untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while cell line DG3 originated from pleural effusions recurring in the same patient after therapy. The results of the present study show that: (a) the SCLC lines AE1, AE2 and AE3 are heterogeneous in their biological characteristics and in their chemosensitivity patterns. In particular lines AE2 and AE3 are less responsive to cis-Platinum (DDP) and Adriamycin (ADM) than line AE1, so that they may reflect resistant subpopulations existing within the original tumour, selected following therapy with these drugs. In contrast, however, line AE1 proved more resistant to Vepesid (VP16) than lines AE2 and AE3. (b) The three NSCLC lines are similar in various biological features as well as in their chemosensitivity to DDP and Vinblastine (VBL).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.