Study objectivesNeutrophil influx into the airways is an important mechanism in the pathophysiology of the inflammatory process in the airways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Previously it was shown that anticholinergic drugs reduce the release of non-neuronal paracrine mediators, which modulate inflammation in the airways. On this basis, we investigated the ability of the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium bromide to inhibit a) alveolar macrophage (AM)-mediated chemotaxis of neutrophils, and b) cellular release of reactive oxygen species (ROS).MethodAM and neutrophils were collected from 71 COPD patients. Nanomolar concentrations of tiotropium bromide were tested in AM cultured up to 20 h with LPS (1 μg/ml). AM supernatant was tested for TNFα, IL8, IL6, LTB4, GM-CSF, MIPα/β and ROS. It was further used in a 96-well chemotaxis chamber to stimulate the migration of fluorescence labelled neutrophils. Control stimulants consisted of acetylcholine (ACh), carbachol, muscarine or oxotremorine and in part PMA (phorbol myristate acetate, 0.1 μg/ml). Potential contribution of M1-3-receptors was ascertained by a) analysis of mRNA transcription by RT-PCR, and b) co-incubation with selective M-receptor inhibitors.ResultsSupernatant from AM stimulated with LPS induced neutrophilic migration which could be reduced by tiotropium in a dose dependent manner: 22.1 ± 10.2 (3 nM), 26.5 ± 18,4 (30 nM), and 37.8 ± 24.0 (300 nM, p < 0.001 compared to non-LPS activated AM). Concomitantly TNFα release of stimulated AM dropped by 19.2 ± 7.2% of control (p = 0.001). Tiotropium bromide did not affect cellular IL8, IL6, LTB4, GM-CSF and MIPα/β release in this setting. Tiotropium (30 nM) reduced ROS release of LPS stimulated AM by 36.1 ± 15.2% (p = 0.002) and in carbachol stimulated AM by 46.2 ± 30.2 (p < 0.001). M3R gene expression dominated over M2R and M1R. Chemotaxis inhibitory effect of tiotropium bromide was mainly driven by M3R inhibition.ConclusionOur data confirm that inhibiting muscarinic cholinergic receptors with tiotropium bromide reduces TNFα mediated chemotactic properties and ROS release of human AM, and thus may contribute to lessen cellular inflammation.
IntroductionMyrtol standardized is established in the treatment of acute and chronic bronchitis and sinusitis. It increases mucociliar clearance and has muco-secretolytic effects. Additional anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties have been confirmed for Myrtol standardized, eucalyptus oil, and orange oil in several in vitro studies.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to prove the ability of essential oils to reduce cytokines release and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production derived from ex vivo cultured alveolar macrophages.Material and methodsAlveolar macrophages from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 26, GOLD III-IV) were pre-cultured with essential oils (10-3-10-8%) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml). After 4 h and 20 h respectively a) cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) using 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF), and b) TNF-α, IL-8, and GM-CSF secretion were quantified.ResultsIn comparison with negative controls, pre-cultured Myrtol, eucalyptus oil and orange oil (10-4%) reduced in the LPS-activated alveolar macrophages ROS release significantly after 1+20 h as follows: Myrtol - 17.7% (P = 0.05), eucalyptus oil -21.8% (P < 0.01) and orange oil -23.6% (P < 0.01). Anti-oxidative efficacy was comparable to NAC (1 mmol/l). Essential oils also induced a TNF-α reduction: Myrtol (-37.3%, P < 0.001), eucalyptus oil (-26.8%, P < 0.01) and orange oil (-26.6%, P < 0.01). TNF-α reduction at 1+4 h and 1+20 h did not vary (Myrtol: -31.9% and -37.3% respectively, P = 0.372) indicating that this effect occurs early and cannot be further stimulated. Myrtol reduced the release of GMCSF by -35.7% and that of IL-8 only inconsiderably.ConclusionsAll essential oils tested have effective antioxidative properties in ex vivo cultured and LPS-stimulated alveolar macrophages. Additionally, Myrtol inhibited TNF-α and GM-CSF release best indicating additional potent anti-inflammator y activity.
Our study suggests that the Gly16 allele of the beta2-AR gene predisposes to COPD development but not for exacerbation rates and disease severity. In contrast, Gln/Glu27 polymorphism was irrelevant in our COPD cohort.
ObjectiveAs chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is known for poor glucocorticoid (GC) response, we hypothesized that polymorphic variants of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gene might predispose for COPD and/or disease severity.Materials and methodsThree out of about 50 of the most abundant receptor GR gene polymorphisms were investigated in a case-control study which included 207 patients with chronic bronchitis or COPD (mean FEV1 50.5% predicted, GOLD I-IV) and 106 age matched healthy subjects (mean FEV1 101.8% predicted). These were genotyped: a) for the N363S (Exon 2; 1220 A > G (I)); b) the BCLI restriction fragment length polymorphism (Intron 2; 647 C > G (II)); and c) the ER2223EK (Exon 2; 198, 200 G > A (III)), using RT-PCR and PCR-RFLP method on genomic DNA isolated from EDTA blood.ResultsGenotype distribution between COPD and healthy subjects were alike in all of these three polymorphisms. N363S was found in 0.94% of the healthy and 0% of the COPD subjects. BCLI was detected in 11.3% of the controls and 15.5% of the COPD patients whereas heterozygote frequency was less in the COPD (44.4%) group (controls 60.4%). ER2223EK lacks in any of the study subjects. Further, SNPs did not correlate with COPD severity stage (GOLD), exacerbation rates, and clinical course.ConclusionCOPD is not linked to gene polymorphisms N363S, BCLI-RFLP, and ER2223EK. Since we analyzed only these 3 receptor gene polymorphisms, this study cannot rule out that other GR gene variants and linkages may be of influence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.