The purpose of this study was to investigate the usage of an anatomical model to improve surgical planning of a complex schwannoma resection. As advancements in additive manufacturing continue to prosper, new applications of this valuable technology are being implemented in the medical field. One of the most recent applications has been in the development of patient-specific anatomical models for unique clinical education as well as for preoperative planning. In this case, a multidisciplinary team with expertise in research, three-dimensional printing, and medicine was formed to develop a three-dimensional printed model that could be used to help plan the reduction of a tumor from the cervical spine of a pediatric patient. Image segmentation and stereolithography creation were accomplished using Mimics and 3-matic, respectively. Models were developed on two different printer types to view different aspects of the region of interest. Reports from the operating surgeon indicated that the model was instrumental in the planning procedures of the operation and reducing operation time.

Background: Acetabular fractures account for 10% of pelvis injuries, which are especially difficult to treat in developing countries with less access to resources. 3D printing has previously been shown to be a beneficial method of surgical planning, however the steep initial costs associated with purchasing a 3D printer may prevent some facilities form utilizing this technique. The purpose of this study was to develop 3D printed models for acetabular surgery using methodologies of varying cost to determine differences in model accuracy and overall quality.Methods: Five acetabular fracture models were developed from de-identified CT data using (I) proprietary and open-source segmentation software and (II) fused deposition modeling (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing methods. The distance between the posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS) and the ischial spine as well as a unique fracture fragment for each model was compared between the different printing methodologies. The models were then given to 5 physicians and assessed on their overall accuracy compared to traditional 2D images.Results: Printing methodology did not affect the distance from PIIS to ischial spine (P=0.263). However, fracture fragment representation differed across 3D printed models, with the most accurate model produced by the high-end resin-based printer (P=0.007). The survey analysis showed that the low-cost printing methods produced models that were not as accurate in their representation of the fractured region (P=0.008).Conclusions: The differences between models developed using traditional methods and low-cost methods have slight differences but may still provide useful information when developing a surgical plan.

No abstract