One of the biggest challenges in cognitive neuroscience is developing diagnostic tools for Disorders of Consciousness (DoC). Detecting dynamical connectivity brain states seems promising, specifically those linked to transient moments of enhanced cognitive states in patients. A growing body of evidence indicates that fMRI brain states properties are strongly modulated by the level of consciousness , as theoretically predicted by whole brain modeling. fMRI-based brain states, however, have very limited practical application due to methodological constraints. In this work we defined EEG-based brain states and explored their potential as a bedside, real-time tool to detect transient windows of enhanced brain states. We analysed data from 237 individual patients with chronic and acute DoCs -100 Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS), 96 Minimally Conscious State (MCS) and 41 acute- and 101 healthy controls obtained in three independent research centers (Fudan hospital in Shanghai, Pitié Salpêtrière in Paris and Purpan hospital in Toulouse). We determined five EEG functional connectivity brain states, and show that their probability of occurrence is strongly related to the level of consciousness. Distinctively, high entropy brain states are exclusively found in healthy subjects, while low-entropy brain states increase their probability with DoC’s severity, spanning from acute unarousable comatose state, to more chronic DoC’s patients, who are awake but show fluctuating (MCS) or absent awareness (VS). Furthermore, the brain state probability distribution of each individual subject —and even the presence of certain key brain states— significantly vary with the patients’ outcome. We also tested whether our procedure has an actual potential for real-time, bedside brain state detection, and proved that we can reliably estimate the concurrent brain state of a patient in real time, paving the way for a broad application of this tool for DoC patients’ diagnosis, follow-up, and neuroprognostication.
Confidence in perceptual decisions often reflects the probability of being correct. Hence, we predicted that confidence should be unaffected or be minimally decreased by the presence of irrelevant alternatives. To test this prediction, we designed three experiments. In Experiment 1, participants had to identify the largest geometrical shape among two or three alternatives. In the three-alternative condition, one of the shapes was much smaller than the other two, being a clearly incorrect choice. Counter-intuitively, all else being equal, confidence was higher when the irrelevant alternative was present. We accounted for this effect with a computational model where confidence increases monotonically with the number of irrelevant alternatives, a prediction we confirmed in Experiment 2. In Experiment 3, we evaluated whether this effect replicated in a categorical task, but we did not find supporting evidence. Our findings stimulate the use of multi-alternative decision-making tasks to build a thorough understanding of confidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.