No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The April 1950 issue of the American Psychologist contained two addresses, delivered in 1949 before divisions of the American Psychological Association, which represent opposing trends in academic psychology. Beach's article was welcomed by clinically minded me; for it displayed unmistakable signs of psychology's New Look in statements, but the Old Look, as exemplified by Guthrie's article in the same issue, would be ignored if not for the fact that attitudes such as those he expresses are daily pushing out of academic work and into more lucrative and harmonious pursuits some of the brighter New Look young people. Expulsion of men with applied interests from academic psychology departments, as suggested by Guthrie, would undoubtedly injure most the "systematists" and "purists," for it is these last who have been basking in the reflected prestige won for all of psychology by the practical psychologists rather than the reverse. Guthrie has apparently repressed the fact that the present boom in psychology (which has resulted in unprecedented availability of research funds and students for all areas of the discipline) can be attributed almost exclusively to the popularity earned for the entire field by the successful practical application of psychological findings and method.

CONSIDERAN: que la memoria titulada "Aprovechamiento de herramientas genéticas y genómicas para desarrollo de nuevas poblaciones para la mejora del melón por resistencia a patógenos y calidad" que presenta Don