No abstract

Glycol ethers, or glymes, have been recognized as good candidates as solvents for lithium–air batteries because they exhibit relatively good stability in the presence of superoxide radicals. Diglyme (bis(2-methoxy-ethyl)ether), in spite of its low donor number, has been found to promote the solution mechanism for the formation of Li 2 O 2 during the discharge reaction, leading to large deposits, that is, high capacities. It has been suggested that lithium salt association in these types of solvents could be responsible for this behavior. Thus, the knowledge of the speciation and transport behavior of lithium salts in these types of solvents is relevant for the optimization of the lithium–air battery performance. In this work, a comprehensive study of lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (LiTf) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in 1,2-di-methoxyethane (DME) and diglyme, over a wide range of concentrations, have been performed. Consistent ion pairs and triplet ions formation constants have been obtained by resorting to well-known equations that describe the concentration dependence of the molar conductivities in highly associated electrolytes, and we found that the system LiTf/DME would be the best to promote bulky Li 2 O 2 deposits. Unexpected differences are observed for the association constants of LiTf and, to a lesser extent, for LiTFSI, in DME and diglyme, whose dielectric constants are similar. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations allowed us to rationalize these differences in terms of the competing interactions of the O-sites of the ethers and the SO x groups of the corresponding anions with Li + ion. The limiting Li + diffusivity derived from the fractional Walden rule agrees quite well with those obtained from MD simulations, when solvent viscosity is conveniently rescaled.