Propolis, a complex bee product, is a source of numerous bioactive principles, beneficial for human health, therefore it is intensively studied. In the present work, extracts of propolis from Bihor Romanian County were studied to identify the relationship between the polyphenolic derivatives profile and their antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. Extracts were obtained using water and 25%, 50%, and 70% ethanolic solutions (w/w), at 2:1, 4:1, and 6:1 liquid: solid ratios (w/w). 21 polyphenolic derivatives were quantified by UHPLC-MS, proving that the extracts composition strongly depends on the solvent. The sum of quantified polyphenolics extracted varied between 1.5 and 91.2 mg/g propolis. The antioxidant capacity was evaluated using the free radicals 2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6 sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) and 1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging methods. Antimicrobial efficiency was tested against Gram-positive (B. subtilis), Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli), and fungi (C. albicans) by disc-diffusion method. All extracts, even the aqueous ones, demonstrated antibacterial and antifungal activity. Chemometric methods (partial least squares) and a saturation-type model were used to evaluate the contribution of various bioactive principles in building the antioxidant capacity of extracts. Both experimental and modelling results show that 50% ethanolic extracts provide a rich polyphenolics profile and ensure a good antioxidant capacity.

This study aimed to obtain possible materials for future antimicrobial food packaging applications based on biodegradable bacterial cellulose (BC). BC is a fermentation product obtained by Gluconacetobacter xylinum using food or agricultural wastes as substrate. In this work we investigated the synergistic effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and propolis extracts deposited on BC. ZnO NPs were generated in the presence of ultrasounds directly on the surface of BC films. The BC-ZnO composites were further impregnated with ethanolic propolis extracts (EEP) with different concentrations.The composition of raw propolis and EEP were previously determined by gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC-MS), while the antioxidant activity was evaluated by TEAC (Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity). The analysis methods performed on BC-ZnO composites such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermo-gravimetrically analysis (TGA), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) proved that ZnO NPs were formed and embedded in the whole structure of BC films. The BC-ZnO-propolis films were characterized by SEM and X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS) in order to investigate the surface modifications. The antimicrobial synergistic effect of the BC-ZnO-propolis films were evaluated against Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Candida albicans. The experimental results revealed that BC-ZnO had no influence on Gram-negative and eukaryotic cells.

No abstract

Sea buckthorn (SB) seeds were used as raw material to obtain SB oil using two extraction methods: ultrasound and microwave assisted extraction. The favorable experimental conditions that maximize the extraction efficiency were investigated by applying response surface methodology (RSM). The selected key independent variables were ultrasonic intensity (UI), temperature, and time for ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave power, time, and solid/liquid ratio for microwave assisted extraction (MAE). The results obtained for extraction efficiency under optimal conditions are comparable for the two extraction methods (89.2 ± 0.50% for MAE and 87.4 ± 0.44% for UAE). The operation conditions for maximum extraction efficiency were: 13.77 W/cm2 UI, 40 °C temperature, and 10 min extraction time for UAE and 225 W microwave power, 15 ml/ g solid/liquid ratio, and 20 min extraction time for MAE. The extraction kinetics was characterized using a second order model for optimal conditions for UAE and MAE of SB seed oil. Practical applications This article describes two modern methods of sea buckthorn seed oil extraction: ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave assisted extraction. Both methods offer many advantages if they are likened with conventional oil extraction. The results illustrated that both methods give comparable values for extraction efficiency, but with an advantage for UAE. The extraction time for UAE is shorter in comparison with MAE (10 min in comparison with 20 min).

No abstract