Intimate partner violence (IPV) causes substantial physical and psychological trauma. Restrictions introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and movement restrictions, may exacerbate IPV risk and reduce access to IPV support services. This cross-sectional study examines IPV during COVID-19 restrictions in 30 countries from the International Sexual HeAlth and REproductive Health (I-SHARE) study conducted from July 20th, 2020, to February, 15th, 2021. IPV was a primary outcome measure adapted from a World Health Organization multicountry survey. Mixed-effects modeling was used to determine IPV correlates among participants stratified by cohabitation status. The sample included 23,067 participants from 30 countries. A total of 1,070/15,336 (7.0%) participants stated that they experienced IPV during COVID-19 restrictions. A total of 1,486/15,336 (9.2%) participants stated that they had experienced either physical or sexual partner violence before the restrictions, which then decreased to 1,070 (7.0%) after the restrictions. In general, identifying as a sexual minority and experiencing greater economic vulnerability were associated with higher odds of experiencing IPV during COVID-19 restrictions, which were accentuated among participants who were living with their partners. Greater stringency of COVID-19 restrictions and living in urban or semi-urban areas were associated with lower odds of experiencing IPV in some settings. The I-SHARE data suggest a substantial burden of IPV during COVID-19 restrictions. However, the restrictions were correlated with reduced IPV in some settings. There is a need for investing in specific support systems for survivors of IPV during the implementation of restrictions designed to contain infectious disease outbreaks.

No abstract

Results Among 431 participants across 1,258 visits, 9.3% ( 40/ 431) of participants were MSMW and 90.7% MSM. 30% of MSMW were living with HIV (12/40) compared to 52.4% (205/391) of MSM (p=0.007). In adjusted analysis, MSMW had higher odds of: not discussing sexual orientation/behavior with healthcare providers (AOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.10-4.35), unknown last partner HIV serostatus (2.19; 1.23-3.89), transactional sex (4.35; 2.27-8.36) and last partner also being MSMW (2.10; 1.10-4.02), compared to MSM. Conclusion Despite riskier behaviors for HIV/STI transmission, MSMW had lower odds of discussing these behaviors with their healthcare providers, representing potentially missed opportunities for HIV/STI screening and prevention. Additionally, MSMW had higher odds of having MSMW sexual partners, suggestive of high-risk MSMW sexual networks that may not be uncovered in routine patient-provider discussions and should be prioritized in HIV/STI interventions designed to reduce barriers and facilitate linkages to care.

A new public policy was instituted in Argentina for free distribution of subdermal contraceptive implants to women aged 15–24 years old in the public healthcare system. The objective of this study is to determine the extent to which this population adhered to the implant, as well as predictors of continuation. The retrospective cohort study was based on a telephone survey of a random sample of 1101 Ministry of Health-registered implant users concerning the continuation of use, satisfaction with the method and side-effects, and reasons for removal. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis were used to explore the association between adherence and having received contraceptive counselling, satisfaction, and side effects. We found high levels of adherence (87%) and satisfaction (94%). Common reported side effects were amenorrhoea or infrequent bleeding, perceived weight gain, increased menstrual bleeding and headaches. Multivariate regression analysis indicates that, among adolescents, having received contraceptive counselling increased comfort, while frequent bleeding at six months hindered trust. Participants who had a history of a prior delivery or who had themselves primarily chosen the method were less likely to request the removal of the implant. Our results support the public policy of free implant distribution in the public health sector. This is a sustainable public policy that contributes to equity and access to effective contraception. It is appropriate for adolescents and young women and will also reduce unintended pregnancies. Our results suggest that counselling patients is key prior to insertion of the implant, as it improves acceptability and continuation.