Several wound classification systems are used to assess diabetic foot wounds. The recommendations for their use depend on the authors and foot associations. In this study, we compared Saint Elian score system, WIfI classification and Texas in 101 patients with foot wounds, and we followed them for a median of 149 days, finding differences both in the assigned risk and in the association with major amputation and wound healing. Saint Elian and WIfI scores match when Saint Elian is low or high risk but not when it is moderate. WIfI stages correlate with major amputation and wound healing. Saint Elian III correlates with major amputation. Prevalence of major amputations was 41% for WIfI 4 and 83% for Saint Elian III. WIfI 1 and 2 and Saint Elian I had a rate of wound healing of 80% to 85%. Stages 1 and 2 of WIfI score behave similar with regard to wound healing, 82% and 80% ( P = .71), and major amputation, 0% and 10% ( P = .68). Stages I and II of Saint Elian have the same rates of major amputation, 0% and 8% ( P = .66), but not of wound healing, 85% and 51% ( P < .05). The optimal cut point for detecting major amputation in Saint Elian is 18, with a sensitivity of 90.9 and specificity of 84.9, but there is no recommended cut point for wound healing. These classifications are validated for their use in diabetic foot wounds and to assess amputation risk, helping physicians make decisions and talk to the patients about prognosis.

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are one of the most important reasons for lower limb amputations. An adequate approach to the management of DFI implies control of infection using strategies of tissue debridement and empirical antibiotic treatment based on local microbiology. The aim of this study was to determine the bacterial isolates profile and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in samples from DFI from Latin American centers, on the premise that microbiology of this region differs from that of other continents and influences antimicrobial election. Three hundred and eighty-two samples from soft tissue and bone were studied from 17 centers of 4 countries. Three hundred and seven (80.4%; 95% confidence interval = 75.9-84.2) were positive. Gram negatives (GN) were isolated in 43.8% of all samples, not only in severe but also in mild infections, 51% in bone samples, more frequently in presence of ischemia (47% vs 38%; P = .07) and in wounds with longer duration of the lesion (30-20 days; P < .01). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent single germ (19.9%). Gram positives were isolated more frequently in patients without ischemia (53% vs 40%; P = .01). Enterococcus faecalis was the most frequent germ in bone samples (16.8%). Ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were the oral antimicrobials most effective against GN. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin were the oral antimicrobials most effective against Staphylococcus. Because of GN high antibiotic resistance patterns, patients treated in an ambulatory setting have to be controlled early after starting empiric treatment to assess response to therapy and hospitalize for parenteral antibiotics if oral treatment fails.

Introducción: el pie diabético es una complicación que se presenta del 15 al 25% de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus (DM) a lo largo de su vida. Una vez que aparece, demanda un abordaje multidisciplinario y a menudo requiere internación. Estas internaciones suelen ser prolongadas y costosas dado que para su atención se necesitan complejos procedimientos de diagnóstico y tratamiento. En este contexto, el conocimiento de los datos acerca de la internación de pacientes con pie diabético es importante al momento de tomar decisiones de salud pública e implementar acciones para la prevención, derivación temprana, referencia y contrarreferencia de pacientes.Objetivos: el objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de DM y la tasa de pie diabético (PD) en pacientes internados.Materiales y métodos: se estudiaron 6.776 pacientes internados en 104 instituciones argentinas. El estudio se realizó durante un día elegido por cada institución dentro de un lapso de dos meses (septiembre y octubre de 2017).Resultados: la prevalencia de DM fue de 17,86% y la tasa de PD 14,11%. La tasa de pie diabético con lesiones Wagner 1 o mayor fue de 4,47%. El pie diabético fue el motivo de internación en el 3,16% del total de internados y al 17,85% de los diabéticos internados.Conclusiones: en nuestro conocimiento, este trabajo es el primero realizado en Argentina que abarca ese tamaño muestral y sienta precedente para nuevos trabajos de investigación en el tema.

Charcot Neuroarthropaty (CN) is a complication of diabetes with devastating consequences as it produces severe deformities in the foot developing in recurrent ulcers that rise the probability of amputation. There are several diseases mentioned in the literature that have to be considered for the differential diagnosis of CN, often related to the acute phase (gout, ankle sprain, inflammatory arthritis, cellulitis, venous thrombosis) but there is paucity of information related to the differential diagnosis in later stages (coalescence, remodeling) when there is deformity of the foot. Clinicians and diabetologists are not familiarized with orthopedic pathology and do not have in mind certain diseases that could mimic CN in the subacute or chronic phases and this can develop in a wrong diagnosis. It is important to make a correct diagnosis in patients with suspected CN not only in the acute phase but also in the chronic phase to establish an accurate treatment. This article is a review of the differential diagnosis of CN in subacute and chronic phases showing similarities and differences that can help clinicians and diabetologists to make an accurate diagnosis and treatment. We describe unusual diseases like tendon and muscles disorders, Frieberg's disease, complex pain regional syndrome, transient regional osteoporosis and osteomyelitis superimposed to CN and the main features of each one that could help in making a differential diagnosis

Introducción: el examen del pie es fundamental en pacientes con diabetes mellitus (DM). La correcta evaluación del pie en el paciente que concurre a control diabetológico es clave para establecer factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de úlceras, detectar lesiones, tomar medidas preventivas, realizar una derivación temprana y educar en cuidados del pie.Objetivos: en este estudio se examinaron los pies de personas con DM durante la Campaña de Concientización y Prevención del Pie Diabético el 1º de noviembre de 2019 con el fin de evaluar la presencia de síntomas y signos relacionados con neuropatía, enfermedad vascular periférica, prevalencia de los mismos y conocer el riesgo.Materiales y métodos: se analizaron 165 pacientes en cuatro centros: Sanatorio Güemes (Servicio de Diabetes y Endocrinología), PREDIGMA (Centro de Medicina Preventiva, Posadas, Misiones), Hospital Central de San Isidro, Nexo Centro Médico (Ciudad de Junín) y Hospital Municipal de General Viamonte (Provincia de Buenos Aires).