Telomerase, the ribonucleoprotein enzyme maintaining the telomeres of eukaryotic chromosomes, is active in most human cancers and in germline cells but, with few exceptions, not in normal human somatic tissues. Telomere maintenance is essential to the replicative potential of malignant cells and the inhibition of telomerase can lead to telomere shortening and cessation of unrestrained proliferation. We describe novel chemical compounds which selectively inhibit telomerase in vitro and in vivo. Treatment of cancer cells with these inhibitors leads to progressive telomere shortening, with no acute cytotoxicity, but a proliferation arrest after a characteristic lag period with hallmarks of senescence, including morphological, mitotic and chromosomal aberrations and altered patterns of gene expression. Telomerase inhibition and telomere shortening also result in a marked reduction of the tumorigenic potential of drug-treated tumour cells in a mouse xenograft model. This model was also used to demonstrate in vivo efficacy with no adverse side effects and uncomplicated oral administration of the inhibitor. These findings indicate that potent and selective, non-nucleosidic telomerase inhibitors can be designed as novel cancer treatment modalities.

No abstract

Objective and Background: Inflammation plays a critical role in all stages of atherogenesis. Proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC) and endothelial cells (EC) enhancing the inflammatory response, both contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis. Anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative therapy seems to be a promising therapeutic strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effect of the β-blocker nebivolol in comparison to metoprolol in vitro and to find out whether nebivolol inhibits neointima formation in vivo. Methods and Results: Real-time-RT-PCR revealed a decrease in VCAM-1, ICAM-1, PDGF-B, E-selectin and P-selectin mRNA expression in human coronary artery EC and SMC incubated with nebivolol for 72 hours while metoprolol did not have this effect. Nebivolol reduced MCP-1 and PDGF-BB protein in the culture supernatant of SMC and EC, respectively. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with nebivolol for 0 or 35 days before and 28 days after carotid balloon injury. Immunohistological analyses showed that pre-treatment with nebivolol was associated with a decreased number of SMC layers and macrophages and an increased lumen area at the site of the arterial injury. The intima area was reduced by 43% after pre-treatment. Conclusion: We found that nebivolol reduced the expression of proinflammatory genes in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro whereas metoprolol did not. In vivo, nebivolol inhibited neointima formation by reducing SMC proliferation and macrophage accumulation.

No abstract

In the past, chronic pancreatitis has been regarded as a fairly uniform and largely untreatable disorder that most commonly affects patients who both lack gainful employment or adequate insurance coverage and have a tendency to smoke and drink. Large clinical trials suggest that this perception is not only misguided and discriminatory but also not based on facts. We forgot that the perception of chronic liver disease was similar before World War II, and just like liver cirrhosis the fibrosis and cirrhosis of the pancreas – i.e. chronic pancreatitis – is the end result of a range of environmental, inflammatory, infectious and genetic disorders. A growing number of these have only recently been recognized as a distinct entity and several of which are becoming truly treatable. A large proportion of the risk for developing pancreatitis is conveyed by genetic risk factors, and we estimate that less than half of those have been identified so far. The same holds true for protective factors that can prevent pancreatitis, even in the face of excessive alcohol abuse. Various gene mutations and polymorphisms appear to determine an individual’s susceptibility for developing pancreatic disease, for the severity of the disease, and for the disease progression. The spectrum of genotype/phenotype associations ranges from straightforward autosomal dominant traits with near-complete penetrance, as for the most common mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1), to moderate risks factors without mendelian inheritance patterns, as for SPINK1 and CFTR mutations, to very subtle risk associations and disease modifiers that can only be identified in large cohort studies, as for the chymotrypsin C, calcium-sensing receptor and the anionic trypsin (PRSS2) mutations. Only a better understanding of the disease mechanisms that underlie these changes will make an individualized therapy of pancreatic disorders a realistic option.