Preparing students for their lives beyond schooling appears to be a universal goal of formal education. Much has been done to make mathematics education more "realistic" but such activities nevertheless generally remain within the institutional norms of education. In this article we assume that pedagogic relations are also an integral part of working life, and draw on Bernstein's work to address their significant features in this context. However, unlike participation in formal mathematics education, where the discipline is central, workers are likely to be confronted by, and need to reconcile, a range of other valued workplace discourses, both epistemic and social/cultural in nature. How might mathematics education work towards overcoming the hiatus between these two very different institutional settings? This article will argue that the skills of recontextualisation, central to teachers' work, should be integral to the mathematics education of all future workers. It will consider theoretical perspectives on pedagogic discourse and the consequences of diverse knowledge structures at work, with implications for general and vocational mathematics education.

In this Commentary I will address notions of work, the need for innovation, and the role of workplace mathematics. I will then provide an overview of some of the complex issues that confront the subfield of vocational mathematics education with consequences for current and future workers, drawing in part on the work of Basil Bernstein. Finally, I will address the question of workplace research and offer some possible directions for future research, as well as implications for policy. Reflections on the articles included in this special issue will frame the discussion.

No abstract