SummaryBackgroundLimits on the frequency of whole blood donation exist primarily to safeguard donor health. However, there is substantial variation across blood services in the maximum frequency of donations allowed. We compared standard practice in the UK with shorter inter-donation intervals used in other countries.MethodsIn this parallel group, pragmatic, randomised trial, we recruited whole blood donors aged 18 years or older from 25 centres across England, UK. By use of a computer-based algorithm, men were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 12-week (standard) versus 10-week versus 8-week inter-donation intervals, and women were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 16-week (standard) versus 14-week versus 12-week intervals. Participants were not masked to their allocated intervention group. The primary outcome was the number of donations over 2 years. Secondary outcomes related to safety were quality of life, symptoms potentially related to donation, physical activity, cognitive function, haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and deferrals because of low haemoglobin. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN24760606, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants.Findings45 263 whole blood donors (22 466 men, 22 797 women) were recruited between June 11, 2012, and June 15, 2014. Data were analysed for 45 042 (99·5%) participants. Men were randomly assigned to the 12-week (n=7452) versus 10-week (n=7449) versus 8-week (n=7456) groups; and women to the 16-week (n=7550) versus 14-week (n=7567) versus 12-week (n=7568) groups. In men, compared with the 12-week group, the mean amount of blood collected per donor over 2 years increased by 1·69 units (95% CI 1·59–1·80; approximately 795 mL) in the 8-week group and by 0·79 units (0·69–0·88; approximately 370 mL) in the 10-week group (p<0·0001 for both). In women, compared with the 16-week group, it increased by 0·84 units (95% CI 0·76–0·91; approximately 395 mL) in the 12-week group and by 0·46 units (0·39–0·53; approximately 215 mL) in the 14-week group (p<0·0001 for both). No significant differences were observed in quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function across randomised groups. However, more frequent donation resulted in more donation-related symptoms (eg, tiredness, breathlessness, feeling faint, dizziness, and restless legs, especially among men [for all listed symptoms]), lower mean haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations, and more deferrals for low haemoglobin (p<0·0001 for each) than those observed in the standard frequency groups.InterpretationOver 2 years, more frequent donation than is standard practice in the UK collected substantially more blood without having a major effect on donors' quality of life, physical activity, or cognitive function, but resulted in more donation-related symptoms, deferrals, and iron deficiency.FundingNHS Blood and Transplant, National Institute for Health Research, UK Medical Research Council, and British Heart Foundation.

Writing Committee for the REMAP-CAP Investigators IMPORTANCE The evidence for benefit of convalescent plasma for critically ill patients with COVID-19 is inconclusive.OBJECTIVE To determine whether convalescent plasma would improve outcomes for critically ill adults with COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe ongoing Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial, Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (REMAP-CAP) enrolled and randomized 4763 adults with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 between March 9, 2020, and January 18, 2021, within at least 1 domain; 2011 critically ill adults were randomized to open-label interventions in the immunoglobulin domain at 129 sites in 4 countries. Follow-up ended on April 19, 2021. INTERVENTIONSThe immunoglobulin domain randomized participants to receive 2 units of high-titer, ABO-compatible convalescent plasma (total volume of 550 mL ± 150 mL) within 48 hours of randomization (n = 1084) or no convalescent plasma (n = 916). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary ordinal end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of intensive care unit-based organ support) up to day 21 (range, −1 to 21 days; patients who died were assigned -1 day). The primary analysis was an adjusted bayesian cumulative logistic model. Superiority was defined as the posterior probability of an odds ratio (OR) greater than 1 (threshold for trial conclusion of superiority >99%). Futility was defined as the posterior probability of an OR less than 1.2 (threshold for trial conclusion of futility >95%). An OR greater than 1 represented improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both. The prespecified secondary outcomes included in-hospital survival; 28-day survival; 90-day survival; respiratory support-free days; cardiovascular support-free days; progression to invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal mechanical oxygenation, or death; intensive care unit length of stay; hospital length of stay; World Health Organization ordinal scale score at day 14; venous thromboembolic events at 90 days; and serious adverse events. RESULTS Among the 2011 participants who were randomized (median age, 61 [IQR, 52 to 70] years and 645/1998 [32.3%] women), 1990 (99%) completed the trial. The convalescent plasma intervention was stopped after the prespecified criterion for futility was met. The median number of organ support-free days was 0 (IQR, -1 to 16) in the convalescent plasma group and 3 (IQR, -1 to 16) in the no convalescent plasma group. The in-hospital mortality rate was 37.3% (401/1075) for the convalescent plasma group and 38.4% (347/904) for the no convalescent plasma group and the median number of days alive and free of organ support was 14 (IQR, 3 to 18) and 14 (IQR, 7 to 18), respectively. The median-adjusted OR was 0.97 (95% credible interval, 0.83 to 1.15) and the posterior probability of futility (OR <1.2) was 99.4% for the convalescent plasma group compared with the no convalescent plasma group. The treatment effects were consistent across the primary outcome and the 11...

Introduction. The lack of approved specific therapeutic agents to treat COVID-19 associated with SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has led to the rapid implementation and/or randomised controlled trials of convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) in many countries including the UK. Effective CPT is likely to require high titres of neutralising antibody levels in convalescent donations. Understanding the relationship between functional neutralising antibodies and antibody levels to specific SARS-CoV-2 proteins in scalable assays will be crucial for the success of large-scale collection and use of convalescent plasma. We assessed whether neutralising antibody titres correlated with reactivity in a range of ELISA assays targeting the spike (S) protein, the main target for human immune response. Methods. Blood samples were collected from 52 individuals with a previous laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at least 28 days after symptom resolution. These were assayed for SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies by microneutralisation and pseudotype assays, and for antibodies by four different ELISAs. ROC analysis was used to further identify sensitivity and specificity of selected assays to identify samples containing high neutralising antibody levels suitable for clinical use of convalescent plasma. Results. All samples contained SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, whereas neutralising antibody titres of greater than 1:20 were detected in 43 samples (83% of those tested) and >1:100 in 22 samples (42%). The best correlations were observed with EUROimmun IgG ELISA S/CO reactivity (Spearman Rho correlation co-efficient 0.88; p<0.001). Based on ROC analysis, EUROimmun would detect 60% of samples with titres of >1:100 with 100% specificity using a reactivity index of 9.1 (13/22). Discussion. Robust associations between virus neutralising antibody titres and reactivity in several ELISA-based antibody tests demonstrate their possible utility for scaled-up production of convalescent plasma containing potentially therapeutic levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies.

Summary:logous rescue following myeloablative therapy. 1 In this context, PBSC can be successfully mobilised with chemotherapy in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulatWe have carried out an analysis of 44 patients undergoing allogeneic PBSC transplants from fully HLAing factor (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone. 2 Reports of the first allogeneic PBSC transplants (PBSCT) showed that matched related donors with particular emphasis on engraftment kinetics and the incidence and severity of PBSC could be safely mobilised from normal donors using G-CSF alone and could achieve trilineage engraftment in GVHD. The recipients had a median age of 37 years (range 5-56 years), 16 patients had standard-risk disthe recipients, without severe graft versus-host-disease (GVHD). 3,4 The feasibility of this approach has recently ease and 28 had poor-risk disease. GVHD prophylaxis was with cyclosporin A and methotrexate (n = 41), been confirmed in several reported series of patients undergoing allogeneic PBSCT. [5][6][7][8] In these reports large cyclosporin A alone (n = 2) or cyclosporin A and methylprednisolone (n = 1). Stem cells were mobilised using numbers of CD34 + cells were successfully collected from donors following administration of G-CSF and the data G-CSF, collecting a median of 5.75 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg recipient weight (range 0.94-35 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg).confirmed that blood stem cells resulted in long-term haemopoietic engraftment following transplantation. They Engraftment times to a neutrophil count Ͼ0.5 × 10 9 /l and platelets Ͼ20 × 10 9 /l were achieved at a median of also suggested that there may be advantages over allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in terms of faster day +14 (range 10-25) and day + 14 (range 9-130) respectively. Patients receiving у4 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg haemopoietic engraftment, as is the case in autologous transplantation, 9 however, the number of CD34 + cells had significantly accelerated neutrophil and platelet engraftment and this number of CD34 + cells would required for optimal engraftment is still not certain. Allogeneic PBSCT have been performed in the United appear to be a prerequisite for maximum engraftment using PBSC. Acute GVHD occurred in 25 of 43 evaluKingdom (UK) since 1993. To obtain an overview of this activity we surveyed 20 BMT units in the UK and report an able patients although in only 12 was this clinically significant (grades II-IV). Chronic GVHD has occurred in analysis of 44 patients, from nine centres, where allogeneic transplantation using PBSC from related donors had been 17 out of 36 evaluable patients, there was no significant difference between the standard-and poor-risk groups undertaken between March 1993 and March 1996, specifically looking at engraftment kinetics and the incidence of in incidence of either acute or chronic GVHD. In conclusion, these results confirm the feasibility of using acute and chronic GVHD. PBSC for allogeneic transplantation without evidence for increased risk of either acute or chronic GVHD and provide further eviden...

The use of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow as the source of haemopoietic cells for allogeneic transplantation is being increasingly explored. We have analysed data from 17 normal donors who underwent stem cell mobilization for allogeneic transplantation with an identical protocol using G-CSF at a dose of 10