Purpose The goal of this retrospective observational study is to determine whether patients with and without central sensitization (CS) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have similar preoperative expectations. It was hypothesized that the degree of preoperative expectations is higher in patients with CS than in those without. Methods The data of 324 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA for knee osteoarthritis were reviewed and CS was measured using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), which is a validated self-reported questionnaire consisting of a total of 25 questions. CS was deined as a CSI score of 40 or more. Patient expectations were investigated using the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectations Survey (HSS-KRES) comprising ive categories including pain relief, baseline activity, high lexion activity, social activity, and psychological well-being. The expectations of patients, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities arthritis index (WOMAC) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classiication scores were compared between the CS and non-CS groups. ResultsThe top three patient expectations in both groups were pain relief, psychological well-being, and walking ability. The total score for the expectations was 55.0 ± 8.3 in the CS group and 52.3 ± 10.4 in the non-CS group, indicating that the expectations of the CS group were higher than the non-CS group before TKA (p < 0.05). When the items on the HSS-KRES scale and the ive categories were compared, the CS group had signiicantly higher expectations for pain relief and psychological well-being than did the non-CS group (all p < 0.05). ConclusionThe expectations of patients with CS before TKA were higher than those without CS. Given the limited improvement in patient-reported outcome measures of patients with CS undergoing TKA, they should be counseled to be realistic especially with their preoperative expectations of pain relief and psychological well-being. Level of evidence III.

No abstract

IntroductionPedicle screw fixation (PSF) has been the standard therapy for the treatment of various spinal diseases. Although complications are identified regularly, iatrogenic vascular injury is one of the rare but life-threatening complications. In this literature, we describe the first case of inferior vena cava (IVC) injury during pedicle screw removal.Case descriptionA 31-year-old man was treated by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for an L1 compression fracture. After a year, the fracture healed well and hardware removal surgery was performed. During the procedure, the hardware on the right was removed unremarkably except for the L2 pedicle screw which slipped into the retroperitoneum because of the improper technique. The CT angiogram revealed the screw had breached the anterior cortex of the L2 vertebral body and penetrated the IVC. After multidisciplinary cooperation, the defect of IVC was reconstructed and the L2 screw was removed from the posterior approach in the end.ResultThe patient recovered well and was discharged after 3 weeks without further events. The removal of the contralateral implants was unremarkable at 7 months postoperatively. At the 3-year follow-up, the patient returned to his normal daily activity without any complaints.ConclusionAlthough pedicle screw removal is a rather simple procedure, severe complications may have occurred from this procedure. Surgeons should keep vigilant to avoid the complication noted in this case.