INTRODUCTIONHysterectomy, abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy is the most commonly performed elective major gynaecological surgery. 1 The current ratio of abdominal to vaginal hysterectomy is 3:1 for the treatment of benign disorders. The ratio should be reversed because fewer post-operative complications are associated with the vaginal route, which allows earlier recovery and return to work. 2Vaginal Hysterectomy is a technique that had already been introduced and performed centuries ago but with little success among gynaecologist probably because of an in experience or lack of enthusiasm among gynaecologist who performed the abdominal route believing it to be safer and easier procedure. In recent decade increased expertise has been achieved by the gynaecologist and better compliance has been reported by the patients. This has led to increased number of vaginal hysterectomies compared to abdominal hysterectomies.Vaginal surgery is least invasive and results in better quality of life. Many nulliparous women and many women who have undergone caesarian delivery do infact have sufficient vaginal capacity to allow vaginal hysterectomy. As long as surgeon can obtain adequate ABSTRACT Background: Hysterectomy is the major gynaecological surgery performed by gynaecologist all over the world. Various approaches have been tried by gynaecologist all over the world including abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, notes and robotic hysterectomy. Vaginal approach greatly reduces complications, decreases hospital stay, lowers hospital charges, post-operative discomfort and cosmetically better compared to abdominal and laparoscopic approaches. Vaginal hysterectomy in large sized uterus can be facilitated by bisection, myomectomy, debulking, coring and clamp less approach. The aim and objective of the study was to compare outcome of NDVH with outcome of TAH in terms of post-operative morbidity and duration of hospital stay. Methods: A total of 100 cases were selected with enlarged uterus of which 50 underwent NDVH and rest 50 underwent TAH. All patients were evaluated for operative time, intra-operative and post-operative complications and duration of hospital stay. Data were recorded and processed and standard statistical software were used. Results: Patients undergoing NDVH had an average operating time of 48.68 mins whereas for those undergoing TAH was 92.52 mins ('p'-value <0.001). Intra-operative complications were noted in 2% of patients undergoing NDVH whereas in 20% of patients undergoing TAH ('p'-value 0.016). Post-operative complications were noted in 34% of patients undergoing NDVH v/s 70% in TAH ('p'-value <0.001). Patients undergoing NDVH had a mean hospital stay of 5.96 days whereas 9.10 days in those undergoing TAH ('p'-value <0.001). Conclusions: NDVH is associated with decreased operative time, post-operative morbidity, early ambulation and early discharge from hospital compared to TAH.
Preterm birth is a major cause of death and a significant cause of long-term loss of human potential amongst survivors all around the world. Complications of preterm birth are the single largest direct cause of neonatal deaths, responsible for 35% of the world’s 3.1 million deaths a year, and the second most common cause of under-5 deaths after pneumonia. In this study, an attempt has been made to evaluate the usefulness of cervical assessment by TVS in prediction of risk of preterm delivery in low risk pregnant women, thereby earlier management option can be planned and patients specific treatment can be given at the earliest. The present study was carried out in tertiary care teaching hospital for 1 year from 1 Jan 2019 to 31 Dec 2019. Total of 100 study participants who underwent TVS assessments of cervix regularly followed up who underwent TVS assessment of cervix and were regularly follow up and delivered. The mean cervical length in all these women was 30±6.68 mm. It was observed that 51.72% of patients with short cervical length less than 25 mm had preterm labour compared to the patients with cervical length more than 25mm i.e. 4.22%. Cervical assessment by TVS is effective in predicting preterm labour.
Infertility is best defined as the inability to conceive after one year of unprotected regular intercourse or many couples, infertility and its treatment cause a serious strain on their interpersonal relationship, and cause disturbed relationships with other people.Diagnostic laparoscopy is generally not a part of initialinfertility evaluation, however, number of reports haveshown that it is effective procedure for evaluation of long- term infertility. A total of 207 patients were studied from at GMCH, Gondia, Maharashtra. Total 207 patients had primary/secondary infertility and 5 patients had primary amenorrhea were selected for study. Uterus, ovaries, tubes and cul de sac were inspected and findings noted. Next chromopertubation test was done with 10-15 ml of 1% aqueous methylene blue via the leech-Wilkinson cannula was inserted and findings noted and statistical Analysis was done.India showed the mean age of infertility was 28.4years. 81.16% subjects had primary whereas 16.43% had secondary infertility.In the present study maximum 165 (79.7%) had normal size uterus. Out of which 8 (3.86%) had bicornuate uterus.6.28% subjects had large size uterus. Out of which 5.80% had fibroid and 0.48% had adenomyosis.Diagnostic Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is a better modality for diagnosing uterine, tubal and ovarian causes of infertility compared to hysterosalpingography and ultrasonography. Most of the patients had normal ultrasonographic, hysterosalpingographic and laparoscopic findings. Out of the rest, Structural adhesions were the most common cause of infertility among women in reproductive group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.