Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and immunosuppression, such as in renal transplantation (RT), stand as one of the established potential risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Case morbidity and mortality rates for any type of infection have always been much higher in CKD, haemodialysis (HD) and RT patients than in the general population. A large study comparing COVID-19 outcome in moderate to advanced CKD (Stages 3–5), HD and RT patients with a control group of patients is still lacking. Methods We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study, involving hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 from 47 centres in Turkey. Patients with CKD Stages 3–5, chronic HD and RT were compared with patients who had COVID-19 but no kidney disease. Demographics, comorbidities, medications, laboratory tests, COVID-19 treatments and outcome [in-hospital mortality and combined in-hospital outcome mortality or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU)] were compared. Results A total of 1210 patients were included [median age, 61 (quartile 1–quartile 3 48–71) years, female 551 (45.5%)] composed of four groups: control (n = 450), HD (n = 390), RT (n = 81) and CKD (n = 289). The ICU admission rate was 266/1210 (22.0%). A total of 172/1210 (14.2%) patients died. The ICU admission and in-hospital mortality rates in the CKD group [114/289 (39.4%); 95% confidence interval (CI) 33.9–45.2; and 82/289 (28.4%); 95% CI 23.9–34.5)] were significantly higher than the other groups: HD = 99/390 (25.4%; 95% CI 21.3–29.9; P < 0.001) and 63/390 (16.2%; 95% CI 13.0–20.4; P < 0.001); RT = 17/81 (21.0%; 95% CI 13.2–30.8; P = 0.002) and 9/81 (11.1%; 95% CI 5.7–19.5; P = 0.001); and control = 36/450 (8.0%; 95% CI 5.8–10.8; P < 0.001) and 18/450 (4%; 95% CI 2.5–6.2; P < 0.001). Adjusted mortality and adjusted combined outcomes in CKD group and HD groups were significantly higher than the control group [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) CKD: 2.88 (1.52–5.44); P = 0.001; 2.44 (1.35–4.40); P = 0.003; HD: 2.32 (1.21–4.46); P = 0.011; 2.25 (1.23–4.12); P = 0.008), respectively], but these were not significantly different in the RT from in the control group [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (0.76–4.72); P = 0.169; 1.87 (0.81–4.28); P = 0.138, respectively]. Conclusions Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with CKDs, including Stages 3–5 CKD, HD and RT, have significantly higher mortality than patients without kidney disease. Stages 3–5 CKD patients have an in-hospital mortality rate as much as HD patients, which may be in part because of similar age and comorbidity burden. We were unable to assess if RT patients were or were not at increased risk for in-hospital mortality because of the relatively small sample size of the RT patients in this study.

Background/Aims: Fabry disease is a treatable cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) characterized by a genetic deficiency of α-galactosidase A. European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) recommends screening for Fabry disease in CKD patients. However, this is based on expert opinion and there are no reports of the prevalence of Fabry disease in stage 1-5 CKD. Hence, we investigated the prevalence of Fabry disease in CKD patients not receiving renal replacement therapy. Methods: This prospective study assessed α-galactosidase activity in dried blood spots in 313 stage 1-5 CKD patients, 167 males, between ages of 18-70 years whose etiology of CKD was unknown and were not receiving renal replacement therapy. The diagnosis was confirmed by GLA gene mutation analysis. Results: Three (all males) of 313 CKD patients (0.95%) were diagnosed of Fabry disease, for a prevalence in males of 1.80%. Family screening identified 8 aditional Fabry patients with CKD. Of a total of 11 Fabry patients, 7 were male and started enzyme replacement therapy and 4 were female. The most frequent manifestations in male patients were fatigue (100%), tinnitus, vertigo, acroparesthesia, hypohidrosis, cornea verticillata and angiokeratoma (all 85%), heat intolerance (71%), and abdominal pain (57%). The most frequent manifestations in female patients were fatigue and cornea verticillata (50%), and tinnitus, vertigo and angiokeratoma (25%). Three patients had severe episodic abdominal pain attacks and proteinuria, and were misdiagnosed as familial Mediterranean fever. Conclusions: The prevalence of Fabry disease in selected CKD patients is in the range found among renal replacement therapy patients, but the disease is diagnosed at an earlier, treatable stage. These data support the ERBP recommendation to screen for Fabry disease in patients with CKD of unknown origin.

Colchicine and statins are well known drugs that cause myopathy and neuropathy. Co-administration of certain drugs with statins may increase myotoxic effect, causing myopathy and varying degrees of rhabdomyolysis. Therefore, it is very crucial to know which statin should be used during a combination therapy including colchicine and other drugs. We present three cases with AA amyloidosis secondary to familial Mediterranean fever, who developed neuromyopathy while receiving the combination of colchicine and statin. We also briefly discussed the different metabolic pathways of statins and colchicine when used together.

Background: Recently some pathogenetic parallels have been drawn between dialysis-induced hypotension and disorders characterized by hemodynamic instability due to autonomic dysfunction, such as neurocardiogenic syncope and idiopathic orthostatic hypotension. Several studies have shown that central serotonergic pathways participate in the abnormal response, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors improve the symptoms of patients with neurocardiogenic syncope or idiopathic orthostatic hypotension. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of sertraline on dialysis-induced hypotension a prospective study was designed. Methods: The data of 9 patients from a 4-week pre-sertraline period were compared with the data of a 4-week sertraline (100 mg daily) period. The therapeutic effect of sertraline requires 4 weeks. Therefore the sertraline period was begun 4 weeks after starting the drug. Results: Post-hemodialysis weights and ultrafiltration volumes were similar in the pre-sertraline and sertraline periods. There were also no changes in hematocrit and serum albumin. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure before dialysis remained unchanged during sertraline treatment. The nadir systolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure after dialysis increased significantly in the sertraline period. The nadir diastolic pressure was also increased significantly but the increase in post-dialysis diastolic blood pressure did not reach statistical significance. The necessity of therapeutic interventions per dialysis session decreased significantly in the sertraline period compared with pre-sertraline period. Conclusions: This pilot study has shown that sertraline has the potential to be a safe and effective therapy for dialysis hypotension. Long-term clinical and pathophysiological studies are currently in progress.

No abstract