The criteria used to evaluate generic drug bioequivalence studies support the FDA's objective of approving generic drug formulations that are therapeutically equivalent to their innovator counterparts.
The US Food and Drug Administration Office of Generic Drugs has developed a question-based review (QbR) for the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) evaluation of an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA). This new QbR system incorporates quality by design and implements risk-based assessment. It recommends that ANDAs be submitted using the Common Technical Document and include the Quality Overall Summary (QOS) that addresses all the QbR questions. The main benefits of this QbR system are to (1) assure product quality through design and performance-based specifications, (2) facilitate continuous improvement and reduce CMC supplements through risk assessment, (3) enhance the quality of reviews through standardised review questions, and (4) reduce CMC review time when applicants submit a QOS that addresses the QbR questions. The QbR was partially implemented in 2006 and is being fully implemented in 2007.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.