A monoclonal antibody (Jel 318) was produced by immunizing mice with poly[d(TmC)].poly[d(GA)].poly[d(mCT) which forms a stable triplex at neutral pH. Jel 318 did not bind to calf thymus DNA or other non pyrimidine.purine DNAs such as poly[d(TG)].poly[d(CA)]. In addition the antibody did not recognize pyrimidine.purine DNAs containing mA (e.g. poly[d(TC)].poly[d(GmA)]) which cannot form a triplex since the methyl group blocks Hoogsteen base-pairing. The binding of Jel 318 to chromosomes was assessed by immunofluorescent microscopy of mouse myeloma cells which had been fixed in methanol/acetic acid. An antibody specific for duplex DNA (Jel 239) served as a control. The fluorescence due to Jel 318 was much weaker than that of Jel 239 but binding to metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei was observed. The staining by Jel 318 was unaffected by addition of E. coli DNA but it was obliterated in the presence of triplex. Since an acid pH favours triplex formation, nuclei were also prepared from mouse melanoma cells by fixation in cold acetone. Again Jel 318 showed weak but consistent staining of the nuclei. Therefore it seems likely that triplexes are an inherent feature of the structure of eucaryotic DNA.

Jel 318 and Jel 466 are triplex-specific monoclonal antibodies which previously have been shown to bind to cell nuclei and chromosomes by immunofluorescence. Their interaction was further characterized by two methods. First, isolated intact nuclei were encapsulated in agarose. Both antibodies showed significant binding to the nuclei which could be inhibited by adding competing triplex DNA but not by adding Escherichia coli DNA to which the antibodies do not bind. Both triplex-specific antibodies inhibited replication and transcription in the nuclei by about 20%. Secondly, the antibodies were introduced into synchronized myeloma cells by osmotic shock of pynocytic vesicles. Cell-cycle studies showed that the myeloma cells had an S phase of about 10 h and a doubling time of about 20 h. The cells were synchronized with thymidine and both cell growth and cell death were monitored. Introduction of the triplex-specific antibodies caused a marked decrease in cell growth without a significant increase in cell death. The effectiveness of the antibodies was improved by the addition of chloroquine diphosphate which inhibits degradation in the lysosomes. As a control, introduction of an antibody specific for a bacterial protein had little effect. In synchronized cells, inhibition of proliferation reached a maximum at 7 to 13 h after the release from the thymidine block. Thus, cells are most sensitive to the triplex-binding antibodies at the end of S phase and during G2. This result is consistent with the view that triplexes are involved in chromosome condensation/decondensation.

Triplex DNA is an unusual conformation of DNA formed when two pyrimidine nucleotide strands share a common purine strand. A monoclonal antibody, demonstrated by numerous criteria to be specific for triplex DNA, was used to investigate the presence and distribution of this unique DNA configuration in nuclei and chromosomes of mouse LM cells and human lymphocytes. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that constitutive heterochromatin in acetic-methanol fixed mouse nuclei was usually, but not always immunofluorescent, suggesting possible cell cycle related variations in the amount of triplex DNA or its accessibility in this condensed chromatin. In fixed mouse and human chromosomes, there was a positive correlation between immunofluorescent staining patterns, Hoechst 33258 banding, and G- and/or C-banding patterns. Unfixed, isolated mouse chromosomes also reacted positively with the antibody, particularly when they were gently decondensed by exposure to low ionic conditions at neutral pH. This result indicates that fixation is not mandatory for antibody staining, suggesting that some mammalian chromosomal DNA may be naturally organized in a triplex configuration. However, there is a possibility that fixation may facilitate the formation of additional triplex DNA complexes in potential sequences or expose previously inaccessible triplex DNA. The precise correspondence between the immunofluorescent patterns produced by anti-triplex DNA antibodies and G- and C-bands known to represent regions of chromatin condensation, suggests a potential role of triplex DNA in chromosome structure and regional chromatin condensation.

Endonuclease digestion of isolated and unfixed mammalian metaphase chromosomes in vitro was examined as a means to study the higher-order regional organization of chromosomes related to banding patterns and the mechanisms of endonuclease-induced banding. Isolated mouse LM cell chromosomes, digested with the restriction enzymes AluI, HaeIII, EcoRI, BstNI, AvaII, or Sau96I, demonstrated reproducible G- and/or C-banding at the cytological level depending on the enzyme and digestion conditions. At the molecular level, specific DNA alterations were induced that correlated with the banding patterns produced. The results indicate that: (1) chromatin extraction is intimately involved in the mechanism of endonuclease-induced chromosome banding. (2) The extracted DNA fragments are variable in size, ranging from 200 bp to more than 4 kb in length. (3) For HaeIII, there appears to be variation in the rate of restriction site cleavage in G- and R-bands; HaeIII sites appear to be more rapidly cleaved in R-bands than in G-bands. (4) AluI and HaeIII ultimately produce banding patterns that reflect regional differences in the distribution of restriction sites along the chromosome. (5) BstNI restriction sites in the satellite DNA of constitutive heterochromatin are not cleaved intrachromosomally, probably reflecting an inaccessibility of the BstNI sites to enzyme due to the condensed nature of this chromatin or specific DNA-protein interactions. This implies that some enzymes may induce banding related to regional differences in the accessibility of restriction sites along the chromosome. (6) Several specific nonhistone protein differences were noted in the extracted and residual chromatin following an AluI digestion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Purine.pyrimidine (pur.pyr) DNA tracts are prevalent in eukaryotic genomes. They can adopt a triplex conformation in vitro under conditions that may exist in vivo, suggesting that triplex (H-) DNA may exist naturally in chromosomes. To explore this possibility and gain insight concerning potential functions, the distribution of triplex DNA was studied in fixed polytene chromosomes of Chironomus tentans and Drosophila melanogaster by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using an anti-triplex DNA monoclonal antibody (Jel 318). Chromosomes stained with this antibody exhibited immunopositive regions corresponding to condensed chromatin bands; interbands were less immunofluorescent. These results imply that there is more triplex DNA in bands than in interbands. In Chironomus, nucleolar organizer regions and Balbiani rings were immunonegative, indicating that triplex DNA is not present in decondensed, transcriptionally active chromatin. A few specific bands in both Chironomus and Drosophila were intensely immunofluorescent. In Drosophila, one such region was 81F on chromosome 3R. Competition during staining with exogenously added sequences corresponding to a constituent 1.672 g/cm3 satellite DNA in region 81F failed to abolish the immunofluorescence, suggesting that the satellite DNA does not fortuitously react with Jel 318 and implying that unidentified pur.pyr sequences forming triplex DNA are also present at this location. Region 81F exhibits ectopic pairing with nonrelated chromosome regions that have also proven to be intensely immunopositive; this suggests that the formation of triplex DNA between common, shared pur.pyr sequences in these otherwise nonhomologous bands might account for the ectopic pairing phenomenon. Together with our previous results, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that triplex DNA may play a role in chromosome organization by participating in regional chromatin condensation.