Patients: A total of 209 outpatients with mild to moderate AD were randomized into the double-blind treatment phase. The median age of the patients was 75 years, 58.9% were APOE ε4 carriers, and baseline measures of disease severity were similar among groups.

disease (AD) is important for clinical management and affords the opportunity to assess potential disease-modifying agents in clinical trials. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a randomized trial to prospectively enrich a study population with prodromal AD (PDAD) defined by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker criteria and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) symptoms. OBJECTIVES To assess the safety of the γ-secretase inhibitor avagacestat in PDAD and to determine whether CSF biomarkers can identify this patient population prior to clinical diagnosis of dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial with a parallel, untreated, nonrandomized observational cohort of CSF biomarker-negative participants was conducted May 26, 2009, to July 9, 2013, in a multicenter global population. Of 1358 outpatients screened, 263 met MCI and CSF biomarker criteria for randomization into the treatment phase. One hundred two observational cohort participants who met MCI criteria but were CSF biomarker-negative were observed during the same study period to evaluate biomarker assay sensitivity. INTERVENTIONS Oral avagacestat or placebo daily. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURE Safety and tolerability of avagacestat. RESULTS Of the 263 participants in the treatment phase, 132 were randomized to avagacestat and 131 to placebo; an additional 102 participants were observed in an untreated observational cohort. Avagacestat was relatively well tolerated with low discontinuation rates (19.6%) at a dose of 50 mg/d, whereas the dose of 125 mg/d had higher discontinuation rates (43%), primarily attributable to gastrointestinal tract adverse events. Increases in nonmelanoma skin cancer and nonprogressive, reversible renal tubule effects were observed with avagacestat. Serious adverse event rates were higher with avagacestat (49 participants [37.1%]) vs placebo (31 [23.7%]), attributable to the higher incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. At 2 years, progression to dementia was more frequent in the PDAD cohort (30.7%) vs the observational cohort (6.5%). Brain atrophy rate in PDAD participants was approximately double that of the observational cohort. Concordance between abnormal amyloid burden on positron emission tomography and pathologic CSF was approximately 87% (κ = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87). No significant treatment differences were observed in the avagacestat vs placebo arm in key clinical outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Avagacestat did not demonstrate efficacy and was associated with adverse dose-limiting effects. This PDAD population receiving avagacestat or placebo had higher rates of clinical progression to dementia and greater brain atrophy compared with CSF biomarker-negative participants. The CSF biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography imaging were correlated, suggesting that either modality could be used to confirm the presence of cerebral amyloidopathy and identify PDAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00890890

A hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is the accumulation of brain amyloid b-peptide (Ab), generated by g-secretasemediated cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). Therefore, g-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) may lower brain Ab and offer a potential new approach to treat AD. As g-secretase also cleaves Notch proteins, GSIs can have undesirable effects due to interference with Notch signaling. Avagacestat (BMS-708163) is a GSI developed for selective inhibition of APP over Notch cleavage. Avagacestat inhibition of APP and Notch cleavage was evaluated in cell culture by measuring levels of Ab and human Notch proteins. In rats, dogs, and humans, selectivity was evaluated by measuring plasma blood concentrations in relation to effects on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Ab levels and Notch-related toxicities. Measurements of Notch-related toxicity included goblet cell metaplasia in the gut, marginal-zone depletion in the spleen, reductions in B cells, and changes in expression of the Notchregulated hairy and enhancer of split homolog-1 from blood cells. In rats and dogs, acute administration of avagacestat robustly reduced CSF Ab40 and Ab42 levels similarly. Chronic administration in rats and dogs, and 28-day, single-and multipleascending-dose administration in healthy human subjects caused similar exposure-dependent reductions in CSF Ab40. Consistent with the 137-fold selectivity measured in cell culture, we identified doses of avagacestat that reduce CSF Ab levels without causing Notch-related toxicities. Our results demonstrate the selectivity of avagacestat for APP over Notch cleavage, supporting further evaluation of avagacestat for AD therapy.

The mechanism and consequences of the serum thyroid hormone lowering effect of perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) were examined. Thyroid and pituitary gland functions in PFDA-treated rats were assessed by measuring radioiodine uptake from the circulation and the ability of the thyroid gland to secrete thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) in response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation. Serum levels of reverse triiodothyronine (rT3) were measured to test for possible conversion of T4 to a biologically inactive product and the displacement of radiolabeled T4 from rat albumin in vitro by PFDA was examined. Finally, changes in activity of the thyroid hormone-sensitive liver enzymes glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) and malic enzyme (ME) in response to PFDA were analyzed. Functional activities of the thyroid and/or pituitary glands appear to be somewhat depressed by PFDA treatment. There was no increased conversion of T4 to rT3. PFDA displaced radiolabeled T4 from rat albumin with an affinity similar to thyroxine. The activities of both GPD and ME were significantly increased in livers from PFDA-treated rats. These results suggest that decreased serum levels of thyroid hormones may be due to (1) reduced responsiveness of the thyroid and/or pituitary glands to hormonal stimulation and (2) a displacement of circulating hormones from plasma protein binding sites by PFDA. Increased activity of the liver enzymes GPD and ME does not reflect the reduction in circulating thyroid hormones and indicates that PFDA-treated rats are apparently not functionally hypothyroid at the tissue level.