The histopathologic criteria most useful for grading of mucoepidermoid carcinomas are controversial. To identify those histologic features most important in the grading of intraoral mucoepidermoid carcinomas, 143 cases of this disease with clinicopathologic correlations were studied. Twelve histopathologic features of each tumor and their clinical presentation were correlated with patient outcome. Seven patients died of disease, 5 had regional metastases only, 10 had recurrences only, and 121 had no additional problems. Clinical features suggesting aggressive behavior were short duration, presence of clinical symptoms, and location of tumor in the tongue and floor of the mouth. The histopathologic features that indicated high‐grade behavior were an intracystic component of less than 20%, four or more mitotic figures per ten high‐power fields, neural invasion, necrosis, and cellular anaplasia. The simultaneous assessment of these features showed improved prognostic correlation over individual parameters. A quantitative grading system was devised using these features. Tumors with a point score of 0 to 4 were considered low grade, and none of 122 patients with scores in this range died of their tumor, although 9 had recurrences only and 3 had regional metastases. Point scores of 7 or above indicated highly aggressive behavior. Six of ten patients with these high scores died of tumor. Most of these six patients had recurrences and regional metastases, and all had distant metastases. Two other patients had regional metastases only. Scores of 5 to 6 were considered intermediate between low‐grade and high‐grade scores because only 1 of 13 patients with these scores died of disease. Three of the five patients with regional metastasis had low‐grade tumors, indicating the inability of the grading system to identify them. Nonetheless, with an average follow‐up on these patients of 10 years after treatment of the metastasis, no patient had additional problems. The relative objectivity of our proposed grading system for intraoral mucoepidermoid carcinomas may help achieve more accurate and consistent grading of these rare tumors.
We describe nine cases of a histologically distinct and previously unreported lesion of the major salivary glands. The patients ranged in age from 12 to 63 years and included four males, five females. The lesions were slow-growing masses in the parotid gland (eight cases) and submandibular gland (one case). The clinical impression in each case was a benign salivary gland tumor. Grossly, the lesions were discrete, pale, rubbery nodules embedded within the salivary gland parenchyma. Microscopically, the lesions were unencapsulated, circumscribed masses of sclerotic and hyalinized collagenous tissue. Irregularly distributed throughout the collagenous tissue in a vaguely lobular pattern were hyperplastic ductal and acinar elements that were usually accompanied by cystically ectatic ducts. The dilated ducts frequently showed apocrine-like metaplasia and epithelial hyperplasia, which often formed transluminal bridges in a cribriform pattern. This epithelial hyperplasia sometimes surrounded eosinophilic globules as seen in so-called collagenous spherulosis. The combination of fibrosis, epithelial hyperplasia, and cystic changes were reminiscent of fibrocystic changes of the breast. Focally, acinar elements contained large, intensely eosinophilic, periodic acid-Schiff's-positive, intracytoplasmic granules believed to represent altered zymogen granules. A sparse to focally intense lymphocytic infiltrate accompanied the epithelial proliferations. Previous interpretations of these masses have included mucoepidermoid carcinoma, low-grade adenocarcinoma, benign adenoma, and mixed tumor. The limited available follow-up suggests that this process has a favorable prognosis despite recurrences in two cases. It is postulated that these lesions represent a pseudoneoplastic condition that results in both fibrosis and epithelial proliferation. We suggest the term sclerosing polycystic adenosis for these rare lesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.