BackgroundPhysician burnout is of growing concern. Burnout among physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) physicians has shown a significant increase, positioning PM&R as one of the most “burned out” of specialties. Little has been written about potential factors contributing to physiatrist burnout or potential interventions.ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of burnout among physiatrists and identify risk factors for burnout and potential strategies to decrease burnout among physiatrists.DesignProspective cross‐sectional survey.SettingNational survey of board certified physiatrists. Participants: One thousand five hundred thirty‐six physiatrists certified by the American Board of PM&R.OutcomeThe Mini‐Z Burnout Survey, 1 question from the Maslach Burnout Scale on callousness toward patients, and several potential drivers of burnout. The probability of burnout, identified by question 3 on the Mini‐Z, was the dependent variable. Other questions on the Mini‐Z were explored as independent variables using logistic regression.ResultsSeven hundred seventy physiatrists (50.7%) fulfilled the definition of burnout. Only 38% of physiatrists reported not becoming more callous toward patients. The top 3 causes of burnout identified by physiatrists were increasing regulatory demands, workload and job demands, and practice inefficiency and lack of resources. Higher burnout rate was associated with high levels of job stress and working more hours per week. Lower burnout rates were associated with higher job satisfaction, control over workload, professional values aligned with those of department leaders, and sufficient time for documentation. There was no significant association between burnout and sex, years in practice, practice focus, or practice area.ConclusionBurnout is a significant problem among PM&R physicians and is pervasive throughout the specialty. Opportunities exist to address major contributing drivers of burnout relating to practice patterns and efficiency of care within PM&R. These opportunities are, to varying degrees, under the control of hospital leaders, practice administrators, and practitioners.

To further our understanding of the consequences of training in recovery principles and practices, this study examined ACT team workers' responses to a state-wide recovery training initiative. Analysis of trainees' comments revealed ten themes expressing endorsement of or difficulties with recovery-oriented practices. Trainees' comments supporting a recovery orientation described service recipients in holistic terms and described using various techniques to attain "client-centered" goals. Recovery-oriented tasks that posed dilemmas for trainees were: reconciling system-centered goals with recipients' goals, establishing collaborative relationships with recipients, and using a recovery orientation with recipients who are in crisis and/or who "don't admit to being mentally ill."

Nursing manager's leadership development is a continuous process. Supporting and challenging nursing managers is likely to generate uncertainty related to self and role. The sharing and testing of this uncertainty with peers is welcomed and warrants further exploration.

Objective The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between performance on the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation primary certification examinations and the risk of subsequent disciplinary actions by state medical boards over a physician's career. The hypothesis is that physicians who do not pass either or both of the two initial specialty certification examinations are at higher risk of disciplinary action from a state medical licensing board. Design This is a retrospective cohort study that analyzed board certification examination data from all physicians who completed physical medicine and rehabilitation residency between 1968 and 2017. Results Matching examination and license data were available for 9889 physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, who received a total of 547 disciplinary action reports through the Federation of State Medical Boards. The results showed a significant correlation between failing an American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation certification examination and the risk of subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Failure to pass either the written (Part I) or oral (Part II) examination increased the risk of subsequent disciplinary action by 5.77-fold (P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval = 4.07–8.18). Conclusions Physicians in physical medicine and rehabilitation who do not pass initial certification examinations and become board certified are at higher risk of disciplinary action from a state medical licensing board throughout their careers.