Medical surveillance in workplaces that use beryllium-containing materials can identify individuals with BeS and at-risk groups of workers, which can help prioritize efforts to reduce inhalational and dermal exposures.

We evaluated the ability of both the conventional and high resolution computed tomography (CCT and HRCT, respectively) scans of the thorax to detect early silicosis in subjects exposed to silica dust in the mines and foundries of Québec for an average of 29 +/- 2 yr. The study was limited to subjects with chest radiograph (CR) of the International Labor Organization (ILO) Categories 0 or 1 as determined independently a priori. All subjects had a standard high-kilovoltage posteroanterior and lateral CR, a set of 10 to 15 1 cm collimation CCT scans, and a set of three to five 2 mm collimation HRCT scans in the upper, middle, and lower lung fields. For each CR and sets of CT scans, readings were done independently by four experienced readers. For small opacities of the lung parenchyma on CR, 32 of the 51 subjects were normal (Group A), six were indeterminate (Group B), and 13 were abnormal (Group C). By the combined readings of HRCT and CCT, 13 of the subjects (40%) in Group A were abnormal (p less than 0.001); four of the subjects in Group B were abnormal, and in Group C, one subject was normal, one indeterminate, and 11 (84%) abnormal. For confluence of small opacities, 48 of the 51 subjects were negative (Group 0), and three were positive (Group 1) on the CR. By the CT scan, 42 of the 48 subjects in Group 0 were negative, and the three subjects in Group 1 were positive; thus the CT scan added six positive cases with confluence of small opacities (six of 48, 12.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

Computed tomography (CT; both conventional (CCT) and high resolution (HRCT)) scans of the thorax were evaluated to detect early asbestosis in 61 subjects exposed to asbestos dust in Quebec for an average of 22(3) years and in five controls. The study was limited to consecutive cases with chest radiographs of the International Labour Organisation categories 0 or 1 determined independently. All subjects had a standard high kilovoltage posteroanterior and lateral chest radiograph, a set of 10-15 1 cm collimation CCT scans and a set of three to five 2 mm collimation HRCT scans in the upper, middle, and lower lung fields. Five experienced readers independently read each chest radiograph and sets of CT scans. On the basis of three to five readers agreeing for small opacities of the lung parenchyma, 12146 (26%) negative chest radiographs were positive on CT scans, but 6/18 (33%) positive chest radiographs were negative on CT scan. On the basis of four to five readers agreeing on a chest radiograph, 36/66 (54%) subjects were normal (group A), 17/66 (26%) were indeterminate (group B), and 13166 (20%) were abnormal (group C). By the combined readings of CCT and HRCT, 4131 (13%) asbestos exposed subjects of group A were abnormal (p < 0-001), 6/17 (35%) of group B were abnormal, and in group C, 1/13 (8%) was normal, 2/13 were indeterminate, and 10113 (77%) were abnormal. Separate readings of CCT and HRCT on distinct films in 14 subjects showed that all cases of asbestosis were abnormal on both CCT and HRCT. Inter-reader analyses by kappa statistics showed significantly better agreement for the readings of CT than the chest radiographs (p < 0-001), and for the reading of CCT than HRCT (p < 0.01). Thus CT scans of the thorax identifies significantly more irregular opacities consistent with the diagnosis of asbestosis than the chest radiograph (20 cases on CT scans v 13 on chest radiographs when four to five readers agreed, 13% of asbestos exposed subjects with normal chest radiographs or 21% of asbestos exposed subjects with normal or near normal chest radiographs. It decreased the number of indeterminate cases significantly from 17 on chest radiographs to 13 on CT scans. All cases of asbestosis detected only on CT scans were similarly seen on CCT and HRCT and did not have significant changes in lung function. The CT scans significantly reduced the inter-reader variability, despite the absence of ILO type reference films for these scans. (British Journal ofIndustrial Medicine 1993;50:689-698) The current standard criteria for diagnosis of asbestosis are based on an occupational history, interpretation of the chest radiograph by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards,' pulmonary function tests, and lung histopathology when available.23Progress in the imaging of several interstitial lung diseases with the use of computed tomography (CT) scans has repeatedly shown that the CT scan can be more sensitive than the chest radiograph for the detection of diffuse lung parenchymal diseases.4 8 Given the known a...

No abstract