Background Anti‐reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a newfangled minimally invasive technique, with successful outcomes for the management of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We present our initial experience (success rate) and safety profile for this procedure. Methods Consecutive patients with daily dependence on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for GER were prospectively enrolled from September 2016 to August 2019 and underwent ARMS using a cap assisted endoscopic mucosal resection. Severity was assessed by gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire. Gastroscopy and 24‐h pH‐metry was done pre and post procedure. Patient characteristics, PPI requirement, adverse events and follow‐up were documented. Results Sixty‐two patients [44 (71%) male] underwent successful ARMS with a mean age (SD) of 36 (9.9) years. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of patients. Intraoperative bleeding was noted in 62 (100%) patients, endoscopic hemostasis was successfully achieved. At follow‐up dysphagia was seen in 5 (8%) patients which needed a single session of endoscopic dilation. At 2 months, mean (SD) DeMeester score normalized in 45 (72.5%) patients from 76.8 (18.3) to 14.3 (6.1) (P < 0.001). PPI could be stopped in 43 (69.4%) patients. The mean (SD) GERD‐Q score reduced from 10.6 (1.9) to 3.4 (1.5) (P < 0.001). However, in 12 (19.3%) patients low dose of PPIs was continued, while 7 (11.3%) patients continued full dose. Thirty‐eight (61.3%) patients telephonically reported symptomatic improvement and were off PPIs at 12 months. Conclusions Anti‐reflux mucosectomy is safe and effective for treatment of GER. The long term outcomes are favorable, response is durable and promising at our center. Appropriate patient selection still remains primal to the overall success of ARMS.

Background Submucosal tunneling diverticular septotomy by diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy (D-POEM) has emerged as an alternative to surgery for symptomatic esophageal diverticula, but its medium to long-term outcomes are currently unexplored. Methods D-POEM for patients with symptomatic esophageal diverticula was prospectively studied to assess its safety and the 12-month outcomes. Results 25 patients (72 % male; median age 61 years [range 48 – 88]) with a Zenker’s diverticulum (n = 20) or epiphrenic diverticulum (n = 5) were included. Major indications were dysphagia, recurrent bronchoaspiration, and foreign body sensation in 20 patients (80 %), with a mean symptom duration of 2.5 years (range 1 – 4). Complete submucosal tunneling septotomy was achieved in a mean of 36 minutes (range 25 – 45), with 100 % technical success. The median hospitalization was 5 days (range 4 – 10). The mean (standard deviation) Eckardt Score improved significantly from 13.2 (1.0) at baseline to 3.2 (1.4) at 12 months (P < 0.001) with clinical success in 19/22 patients (86 %) and no long-term adverse events. Conclusions D-POEM appears safe and durable in patients with esophageal diverticula. Further multicenter studies with a larger patient cohort are warranted.

Background and aims  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) followed by fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement offers several advantages such as higher technical success rate and the option of necrosectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS guided drainage of patients with WON by using FCSEMS and intracavitary lavage with a solution containing hydrogen peroxide and adopting a step-up approach. Methods  A prospective open label study was carried out at a single tertiary care center between January 2014 and January 2016. Patients with symptomatic WON who underwent EUS guided drainage followed by FCSEMS placement were included. Primary end points were complete drainage with improvement in symptoms or major adverse events. Secondary end points were minor adverse events related to the procedures. Results  A total of 64 patients (mean age 36 years; 52 males) were included. Technical success was achieved in 100 % of patients and clinical success was achieved in 90.6 %. Complete drainage was achieved with FCSEMS alone in 18 (28.1 %), FCSEMS with necrosectomy using lavage in 40 (62.5 %), FCSEMS with percutaneous drainage (PCD) in 5 (7.8 %), and 1 (1.6 %) patient required salvage surgery. The major adverse event was life threatening bleeding in 3 (4.7 %) patients. Minor adverse events were non-life threatening bleeding in 2 (3.1 %) patients and stent migration in 3 (4.7 %) patients. Conclusion  EUS guided WON drainage with FCSEMS followed by necrosectomy with lavage using a solution containing hydrogen peroxide as a step-up approach is a minimally invasive and effective method with a high technical and clinical success rate. Patients with solid debris > 40 % need aggressive management.

Background and Aim Endoscopic ultrasonography‐guided pancreatic ductal intervention (EUS‐PDI) serves as a rescue therapy in patients with failure of retrograde access to the pancreatic duct (PD) at the time of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). We review our experience of this procedure. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS‐PDI for an unsuccessful ERP and altered anatomy. Results A total of 44 (65.9% male) patients underwent EUS‐PDI with a mean age of 43.5 years, (range: 23–67). Transgastric rendezvous technique was carried out in 23/44 (52.3%), transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy in 18/44 (40.9%) and transduodenal pancreaticobulbostomy in 3/44 (6.8%). Overall technical and clinical success was seen in 88.6% (39/44) and 81.8% (36/44), respectively. Technical success of transgastric rendezvous was 95.6% and that of transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy was 77.8%. Two of seven patients with failure to access the PD had successfully undergone EUS‐PD stenting at subsequent attempt. Ten immediate adverse events (AE) were noted which included abdominal pain (n = 4), pancreatitis (n = 2), fever (n = 2), minor bleeding (n = 1), and stripping of wire (n = 1). Delayed AE included stent blockage in 12/39 (30.8%) and spontaneous stent migration in 5/39 (12.8%) which were managed with stent exchange at follow up. The rendezvous technique was associated with fewer AE than transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy. Conclusions Endoscopic ultrasonography‐PDI is an effective treatment modality and salvage therapy in patients with unsuccessful ERP. Technical and clinical success seen with this study is comparable to studies conducted across the world. EUS‐PDI needs to show cost‐effectiveness in future studies.

Infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is a severe complication of acute pancreatitis. Surgery in these critically ill patients can be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Hence, minimally invasive therapies have emerged as an alternative to surgery. Herein, we report a case of severe acute pancreatitis with WOPN which was treated percutaneously with a flexible endoscope through an esophageal self-expanding metal stent using a total retroperitoneal approach. Percutaneous direct endoscopic necrosectomy (p-DEN) using the retroperitoneal route improved the patient’s parameters dramatically with resolution of sepsis without the need for surgery. p-DEN using a flexible endoscope passed through a large bore metal stent shows promise in selected patients with WOPN and can be used in patients who are not ideal candidates for transmural or surgical drainage.