Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly becoming popular in musculoskeletal radiology for its incremental role over conventional MR imaging in the diagnostic strategy and assessment of therapeutic response of bone and soft tissue lesions. This article discusses the technical considerations of DWI, how to optimize its performance, and outlines the role of this novel imaging in the identification and characterization of musculoskeletal lesions, such as bone and soft tissue tumors, musculoskeletal infections, arthritis, myopathy, and peripheral neuropathy. The readers can use the newly learned concepts from the presented material containing illustrated case examples to enhance their musculoskeletal imaging and interventional practices and optimize patient management, their prognosis, and outcomes.

The aim of the study is to determine whether the use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides incremental increase in performance in the osseous-tissue tumor reporting and data system (OT-RADS) with the hypothesis that use of DWI improves interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy. Methods:In this multireader cross-sectional validation study, multiple musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed osseous tumors with DW images and apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Four blinded readers categorized each lesion using the OT-RADS categorizations. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and Conger κ were used. Diagnostic performance measures including area under the receiver operating curve were reported. These measures were then compared with the previously published work that validated OT-RADS but did not include incremental value assessment of DWI.Results: One hundred thirty-three osseous tumors of the upper and lower extremities (76 benign, 57 malignant) were tested. Interreader agreement for OT-RADS with DWI (ICC = 0.69) was slightly lower (not statistically different) from the previously published work that did not incorporate DWI (ICC = 0.78, P > 0.05). The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating curve including DWI of the 4 readers were 0.80, 0.95, 0.96, 0.79, and 0.91, respectively. In the previously published work without DWI, the mean values of the readers were 0.96, 0.79, 0.78, 0.96, and 0.94, respectively. Conclusions:The addition of DWI to the OT-RADS system does not allow significantly improved area under the curve diagnostic performance measure. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging can be prudently used for OT-RADS for reliable and accurate characterization of bone tumors.

Objective: To determine whether the addition of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to conventional MRI improves diagnostic accuracy of bone tumor characterization with the hypothesis that the DWI has incremental value in the diagnosis of osseous tumors. Methods: In this multireader cross-sectional validation study, four musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated osseous tumors blinded to final diagnosis in two rounds—first without DWI or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, then months later with these available. Each reader recorded a binary result as to whether the lesion is benign or malignant. Intraclass correlation (ICC) and Conger’s κ were used. Diagnostic performance measures including area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were reported. Results: 133 osseous tumors of the extremities (76 benign, 57 malignant) were tested. Blinded to DWI, average reader sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value were 0.83, 0.92, 0.94, and 0.82, respectively. With DWI, the values were 0.85, 0.92, 0.94, and 0.83, respectively. Interreader agreement was good for both rounds (0.67 and 0.71, respectively, p-value > 0.05). Average reader confidence was 4.1 and 4.4, respectively (p-value < 0.001). ADC values and DWI/ADC ratios showed significant differences between benign and malignant tumors. Conclusion: DWI and ADC show statistically significantly different values of benign from malignant osseous tumors and mildly increased radiologist confidence with similar interreader reliability. However, given similar diagnostic accuracy, conventional MR imaging is adequate for bone tumor characterization and incremental value of DWI is limited. Advances in knowledge: This paper is the first of its kind to report the use of DWI/ADC ratio for the diagnosis of bone tumors.