Background: Medial meniscal ramp lesion (MMRL), lateral meniscus root tear (LMRT), and anterolateral ligament (ALL) tear are individual injuries that have been described in patients who have an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. However, the prevalence of these lesions and their combination has not been defined. Purposes: To define the individual and combined prevalence of MMRL, LMRT, and ALL tears in a case series of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and to identify the risk factors for combined injuries. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients aged >15 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between January 2019 and June 2021 were enrolled in the study. A preoperative ultrasound scan was performed to look for an ALL tear. The presence of MMRL and LMRT was determined during a standardized arthroscopy exploration. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the individual effect of patient variables on the risk of associated single, dual, triad, or tetrad injuries (MMRL, LMRT, ALL, ACL), represented by an adjusted odds ratio. Results: The case series consisted of 602 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. An isolated ACL injury was present in 147 patients (24%). A dual injury was detected in 34 patients (6%) who had ACL-MMRL, 16 (2.65%) who had ACL-LMRT, and 265 (44%) who had ACL-ALL. A triad injury was detected in 80 patients (13.28%) who had ACL-ALL-MMRL, 36 (6%) who had ACL-ALL-LMRT, and 3 (0.5%) who had ACL-MMRL-LMRT. A tetrad injury pattern was detected in 21 patients (3.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that the occurrence of tetrad injury was significantly lower in older patients (adjusted odds ratio by year, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]; P = .028). Identifying LMRT increased the likelihood of finding MMRL-ALL injuries by 2.11 times (95% CI, 1.09-3.12; P = .031). Conclusion: Isolated ACL tear is less common than combined injuries, which are quite frequent. Younger age is a risk factor for combined injuries. The search for damaged secondary stabilizers of the knee must be meticulous and systematic, especially when 1 injured structure has already been diagnosed.

Objectives The aim of this literature review was to establish consensus with respect to the anatomic features of the articular branches innervating the hip joint, and the distribution of sensory receptors within its capsule. Methods Five electronic databases were queried, between January 1945 and June 2019. Twenty-one original articles providing a detailed description of sensory receptors about the hip joint capsule (13) and its articular branches (8) were reviewed. Results The superior portions of the anterior capsule and the labrum were found to be the area of densest nociceptive innervation. Similar to the distribution of nociceptors, mechanoreceptor density was found to be higher anteriorly than posteriorly. Hip joint capsular innervation was found to consistently involve the femoral and obturator nerves, which supply the anterior capsule, and the nerve to the quadratus femoris which supplies the posterior capsule. The femoral and obturator and superior gluteal nerves supply articular branches to the most nociceptor-rich region of the hip capsule. Conclusions The femoral, obturator, and nerve to the quadratus femoris were found to consistently supply articular branches to both the anterior and posterior capsule of the hip joint. The anterior capsule, primarily supplied by the femoral and obturator nerves, and superior labrum appear to be the primary pain generators of the hip joint given their higher density of nociceptors and mechanoreceptors

Purpose The therapeutic algorithm of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears remains controversial. The primary aim of the study was to describe variations in practice patterns among European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) members with respect to management of ACL tears in skeletally immature patients. The secondary objective was to determine the number, type and severity of growth disturbances associated with ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Methods An email invitation to complete a 52-question survey was sent to all members of POSNA and EPOS. Data were collected automatically. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results In all, 305 (25.4%) surgeon members responded. Only 182 (60%) of the participants treated ACL injuries in skeletally immature patients and completed the survey. A total of 17% of EPOS and 70% of POSNA members recommended ACLR within three months for a prepubescent paediatric ACL tear. In total, 61% of POSNA and 83% of EPOS members recommended ACLR within three months for a pubescent paediatric ACL tear. Epiphyseal tunnels were the preferred technique in prepubescent children (43% at the tibia and 49% at the femur), while transphyseal tunnels were recommended preferentially in pubescent children (85% at the tibia and 63% at the femur). In all, 5.5% of participants reported growth disturbances after ACLR. Conclusion Current practice patterns across the Atlantic remain varied and controversial. Consensus remains elusive; as such, research collaboration among societies will be important to develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm. The use of transphyseal tunnels has been reinforced. The number of cases of significant growth disturbance is minimal, yet worrisome. Level of Evidence II

We describe an ultrasound-guided anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction technique that uses the gracilis tendon and can be added to any anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique. Preoperative ultrasound imaging is used to view the ruptured ALL and confirm the location of bony landmarks. Two minimally invasive incisions are made: one posterior to the lateral epicondyle and one posterior to the Gerdy tubercle. After anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation, the 2-strand gracilis tendon is introduced from the tibial incision, under the fascia lata, toward the femoral incision. The ALL graft is secured to the femur with a 5.5-mm anchor, positioned posteriorly and proximally to the lateral epicondyle. The distal end of the graft is tightened in full extension and fixed to the tibia with a ligament staple posterior to the Gerdy tubercle. This ALL technique requires no graft preparation.

IV, retrospective study.