Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitals worldwide, because of its virulence, spore-forming ability and persistence1,2. C. difficile-associated diseases (CDAD) are induced by antibiotic treatment or disruption of the normal gastrointestinal flora3,4. Recently, morbidity and mortality resulting from CDAD have increased significantly due to changes in the virulence of the causative strains and antibiotic usage patterns1,2,5,6. Since 2002, epidemic toxinotype III NAP1/027 strains1,2, which produce high levels of the major virulence factors, toxin A and toxin B, have emerged. These toxins have 63% amino acid sequence similarity7 and are members of the large clostridial glucosylating toxin family, which are monoglucosyltransferases that are proinflammatory, cytotoxic and enterotoxic in the human colon8–10. Inside host cells, both toxins catalyze the transfer of glucose onto the Rho family of GTPases, leading to cell death8, 11. However, the role of these toxins in the context of a C. difficile infection is unknown. Here we describe the construction of isogenic tcdA and tcdB mutants of a virulent C. difficile strain and their use in the hamster disease model to show that toxin B is a key virulence determinant. Previous studies showed that purified toxin A alone can induce most of the pathology observed following infection of hamsters with C. difficile8,9, 12 and that toxin B is not toxic in animals unless it is co-administered with toxin A, suggesting that the toxins act synergistically12. Our work provides evidence that toxin B, not toxin A, is essential for virulence, which represents a major paradigm shift. Furthermore, it is clear that the importance of these toxins in the context of infection cannot be predicted exclusively from studies using purified toxins, reinforcing the importance of using the natural infection process to dissect the role of toxins in disease.

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains produce two toxins (TcdA and TcdB) during the stationary phase of growth and are the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. C. difficile isolates of the molecular type NAP1/027/BI have been associated with severe disease and hospital outbreaks worldwide. It has been suggested that these "hypervirulent" strains produce larger amounts of toxin and that a mutation in a putative negative regulator (TcdC) allows toxin production at all growth phases. To rigorously explore this possibility, we conducted a quantitative examination of the toxin production of multiple hypervirulent and nonhypervirulent C. difficile strains. Toxin gene (tcdA and tcdB) and toxin gene regulator (tcdR and tcdC) expression was also monitored. To obtain additional correlates for the hypervirulence phenotype, sporulation kinetics and efficiency were measured. In the exponential phase, low basal levels of tcdA, tcdB, and tcdR expression were evident in both hypervirulent and nonhypervirulent strains, but contrary to previous assumptions, toxin levels were below the detectable thresholds. While hypervirulent strains displayed robust toxin production during the stationary phase of growth, the amounts were not significantly different from those of the nonhypervirulent strains tested; further, total toxin amounts were directly proportional to tcdA, tcdB, and tcdR gene expression. Interestingly, tcdC expression did not diminish in stationary phase, suggesting that TcdC may have a modulatory rather than a strictly repressive role. Comparative genomic analyses of the closely related nonhypervirulent strains VPI 10463 (the highest toxin producer) and 630 (the lowest toxin producer) revealed polymorphisms in the tcdR ribosome binding site and the tcdR-tcdB intergenic region, suggesting that a mechanistic basis for increased toxin production in VPI 10463 could be increased TcdR translation and read-through transcription of the tcdA and tcdB genes. Hypervirulent isolates produced significantly more spores, and did so earlier, than all other isolates. Increased sporulation, potentially in synergy with robust toxin production, may therefore contribute to the widespread disease now associated with hypervirulent C. difficile strains.Clostridium difficile is a leading bacterial nosocomial pathogen. Antibiotic treatment alters and suppresses commensal microbiota, allowing ingested C. difficile spores to germinate and colonize the gut. If the infecting strain is of the toxinproducing lineage of C. difficile (toxigenic), the resulting infection (CDI) can range from mild diarrhea to potentially fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Since 2000, highly virulent variants of toxigenic C. difficile have caused epidemics of CDI characterized by greater incidence, severity, and fatality (12, 25, 29). These "hypervirulent" (HV) strains cluster into a distinct phylogenetic group (38), as assessed by several different molecular methods (21) [33,41]). BI/ NAP1/027 strains have spread rapidly and widely in the past 10 years and have ...

Rifaximin, a poorly absorbed rifamycin derivative, is a promising alternative for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections. Resistance to this agent has been reported, but no commercial test for rifaximin resistance exists and the molecular basis of this resistance has not been previously studied in C. difficile. To evaluate whether the rifampin Etest would be a suitable substitute for rifaximin susceptibility testing in the clinical setting, we analyzed the in vitro rifaximin susceptibilities of 80 clinical isolates from our collection by agar dilution and compared these results to rifampin susceptibility results obtained by agar dilution and Etest. We found rifaximin susceptibility data to agree with rifampin susceptibility; the MICs of both antimicrobials for all isolates were either very low or very high. Fourteen rifaximin-resistant (MIC, >32 g/ml) unique isolates from patients at diverse locations in three countries were identified. Molecular typing analysis showed that nine (64%) of these isolates belonged to the epidemic BI/NAP1/027 group that is responsible for multiple outbreaks and increased disease severity in the United Kingdom, Europe, and North America. The molecular basis of rifaximin and rifampin resistance in these isolates was investigated by sequence analysis of rpoB, which encodes the ␤ subunit of RNA polymerase, the target of rifamycins. Resistance-associated rpoB sequence differences that resulted in specific amino acid substitutions in an otherwise conserved region of RpoB were found in all resistant isolates. Seven different RpoB amino acid substitutions were identified in the resistant isolates, which were divided into five distinct groups by restriction endonuclease analysis typing. These results suggest that the amino acid substitutions associated with rifamycin resistance were independently derived rather than disseminated from specific rifamycin-resistant clones. We propose that rifaximin resistance in C. difficile results from mutations in RpoB and that rifampin resistance predicts rifaximin resistance for this organism.