No abstract

Purpose-Although bronchoscopy has conventionally been performed using conscious sedation, advanced diagnostic techniques like endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), peripheral EBUS, and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy add to procedural complexity. The adaptation of these techniques by bronchoscopists of varied backgrounds is expanding. It is not clear how patients will tolerate these advanced procedures when they are performed using traditional conscious sedation.Methods-We prospectively studied patients that underwent diagnostic bronchoscopic procedures using conscious sedation over a 1-year period. The primary outcome was patient tolerability measured with four questions soliciting subjective responses. Secondary outcomes included required dosage of medications, thoroughness of the procedure, diagnostic yield, and occurrence of complications.Results-A total of 181 patients were enrolled. Compared to patients in whom conventional bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsies were performed, there was no difference in patient Correspondence to: Jonathan T. Puchalski. Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. HHS Public Access Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript tolerability using the advanced techniques. Although some of the advanced procedures added to the procedure time, the required amount of medication was within commonly accepted dosages. When EBUS-TBNA was performed, a mean of 2.8 lymph node stations per patient were sampled. A specific diagnosis was obtained in 55.9 % of patients who solely underwent EBUS-TBNA. The diagnostic yield increased to 75.7 % when a parenchymal abnormality prompted additional biopsies. One patient required sedation reversal. Complications were minimal.Conclusions-This study suggests that advanced diagnostic bronchoscopic procedures are well tolerated using conscious sedation with no compromise of thoroughness, diagnostic yield, or safety. This may be useful for bronchoscopists using these techniques who do not have ready access to general anesthesia.

No abstract

Congenital coronary artery anomalies occur in less than 1% of the general population with clinical consequences ranging from benign incidental findings to sudden cardiac death. More often than not this diagnosis is made on a postmortem examination but up to one third of the patients have symptoms such as exertional chest pain and dyspnea. Due to the correctable nature of this entity and the fact that anomalous origins of coronary arteries can be readily diagnosed by noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities, timely clinical suspicion based on symptoms is critical. We present a case of a 37 years old with exertional chest pain and dyspnea of several years duration who was found to have an anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery. A surgical correction was undertaken which resulted in resolution of his symptoms. Our case highlights the importance of keeping congenital coronary anomalies on the differential diagnosis for exertional chest pain and dyspnea in young individuals and following inconclusive noninvasive testing with more definitive diagnostic modalities.