BACKGROUND:
Hernia repair is associated with considerable postoperative pain. We studied the analgesic efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing open midline epigastric hernia repair (T6–T9).
METHODS:
Sixty patients 18–65 years of age were randomly allocated into 2 groups. Patients in the erector spinae plane block group received bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the level of T7 transverse process using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% on each side, while the control group received bilateral sham erector spinae plane block using 1 mL of normal saline. All patients underwent general anesthesia for surgery. Pain severity (visual analog scale), consumption of intraoperative fentanyl, time to first request of rescue analgesia, and postoperative pethidine consumption were recorded over the first 24 hours postoperatively.
RESULTS:
At 2 hours postoperatively, the visual analog scale pain score was significantly lower in the erector spinae plane block group compared to the control group (estimated main effect of 2.53; P < .001; 95% CI, 1.8–3.2) and remained lower until 12 hours postoperatively (P < .001 from postanesthesia care unit admission to 4 hours postoperatively, .001 at 6 hours, .025 at 8 hours, and .043 at 12 hours). At 18 and 24 hours, visual analog scale pain scores were not significantly different between both groups (P = .634 and .432, respectively). Four patients in the erector spinae plane block group required intraoperative fentanyl compared to 27 patients in control group. The median (quartiles) of intraoperative fentanyl consumption in the erector spinae plane block group was significantly lower (0 µg [0–0 µg]) compared to that of the control group (94 µg [74–130 µg]). Ten patients in the erector spinae plane block group required postoperative rescue pethidine compared to 25 patients in control group. The median [quartiles] of postoperative rescue pethidine consumption was significantly lower in the erector spinae plane block group (0 mg [0–33 mg]) compared to that of the control group (83 mg [64–109 mg]). Time to first rescue analgesic request was significantly prolonged in the erector spinae plane block group compared to control group (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS:
Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block provided lower postoperative visual analog scale pain scores and decreased consumption of both intraoperative fentanyl and postoperative rescue analgesia for patients undergoing open epigastric hernia repair.
TAP block is effective as a part of multimodal analgesia for children undergoing open inguinal hernia repair with significant attenuation in the neuroendocrine stress response induced by surgery.
Background and objectives: Postoperative pain relief is crucial in elderly, however, the use of opioids is limited owing to their potential side effects. We studied the effects of patient-controlled ultrasound guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with Levobupivacaine versus patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl on postoperative pain score in patients scheduled for fixation of femur fractures under general anesthesia. Methods: 60 patients ASA physical status I and II undergoing elective fixation of fracture femur were enrolled in this randomized study into two groups. Patient-controlled IV fentanyl group (PC-IVF): patients received fentanyl 20 µg/ml solutions through a PCA pump programmed to give a basal infusion of 10 µ/h and bolus doses of 2 ml/dose with a 15 min lockout interval. Patient-controlled fascia iliaca compartment analgesia (PC-FICA): PCA was adjusted to deliver a continuous basal infusion of 4 ml/h levobupivacaine 0.125% and 2 ml demand boluses with a lockout interval of 15 min. Visual analogue score (VAS) and total postoperative rescue analgesic consumption were assessed. Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in PC-FICA group compared to PC-IVF group at 1 h, 3 h and 6 h postoperative. 7 patients requested post-operative rescue analgesia in PC-FICA group compared to 19 patients in PC-IVF group. Total consumption of rescue analgesia was significantly decreased in PC-FICA group (31.4 ± 10.7 mg) compared to PC-IVF group (70.5 ± 20.4 mg) (P < .05). Conclusion: PC-FICA provided a better quality of analgesia and decreased postoperative rescue analgesic requirement without increased side effects compared to PCA IV fentanyl.
Background: Optimal relief of pain after knee arthroscopy is essential for early rehabilitation and mobilisation and to minimise postoperative morbidity. This study's aim was to assess dexmedetomidine as an additive to intra-articular (IA) bupivacaine in terms of analgesic duration and postoperative rescue analgesic consumption following arthroscopic knee surgery. Methods: A total of 70 patients, ASA physical status I and II, undergoing knee arthroscopy under general anaesthesia were enrolled in this double-blinded randomised controlled study, after Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201507001048242) approval was obtained. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups; the bupivacaine group (B) received IA 19 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml normal saline, bupivacaine dexmedetomidine group (BD) received IA injection of 19 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + dexmedetomidine 100 μg (1 ml). Postoperative visual analogue pain score (VAS), duration of analgesia and postoperative analgesic requirement were assessed. Results: VAS scores at rest and on mobilisation were significantly lower in the BD group at 4 h, 6 h and 8 h postoperatively in comparison with group B (p < 0.05). VAS scores were comparable between studied groups during the first 2 h, and at 12 h and 24 h postoperatively. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group BD (458.9 ± 93.5 min) than in the B group (229.1 ± 83.7 min) (p < 0.05). Postoperative analgesic consumption was lowered in the BD group compared with the B group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Adding dexmedetomidine to IA bupivacaine after knee arthroscopy prolongs analgesic duration and decreases postoperative analgesic requirement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.