A growing number of universities and colleges across the United States have committed to civic engagement activities, particularly short-term service-learning (SL). Limited research, however, is available about the effects of short-term SL experiences on student development. Objectives The current study attempts to address research gaps in our understanding of this pedagogical technique by conducting qualitative interviews with students involved in a short-term SL project. Methods In this qualitative study, five students (N=5) reported on their short-term SL experience as they related to the following outcomes: (1) Community Service Self Efficacy (CSSE); (2) Community Service Group Efficacy (CSGE); (3) conceptualizations about power, oppression and privilege (POP); (4) attitudes towards marginalized populations being served and (5) citizenship outcomes (such as personal responsibility, participatory citizenship, and justice-oriented citizenship). Results Students reported changes in their beliefs about the ability to create positive social change in communities, as well as their perceptions of marginalized groups. In addition, spending time with and directly hearing the perspective of individuals who have been marginalized in society helped to reduce intergroup anxiety and motivate students to be involved formally and informally in civic activities that can help to improve community-level outcomes. Conclusion Findings suggest that well-designed short-term SL experiences have the potential to shape important student perceptions and intentions regarding civic engagement. This finding is particularly valuable because this pedagogical technique is growing in popularity in higher education. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of promoting best practices in SL and other community-engaged learning experiences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.