TFAM is a DNA binding protein that activates transcription at the two major promoters of mitochondrial DNA — the light strand promoter (LSP) and heavy strand promoter 1 (HSP1). Equally important, it coats and packages the mitochondrial genome. TFAM has been shown to impose a U-turn on LSP DNA, but whether this distortion is relevant at other sites is unknown. Here, we present crystal structures of TFAM bound to HSP1 and to nonspecific DNA. In both, TFAM similarly distorts the DNA into a U-turn. Yet, TFAM binds to HSP1 in the opposite orientation from LSP explaining why transcription from LSP requires DNA bending, whereas transcription at HSP1 does not. Moreover, the crystal structures reveal dimerization of DNA-bound TFAM. This dimerization is dispensable for DNA bending and transcriptional activation, but important in DNA compaction. We propose that TFAM dimerization enhances mitochondrial DNA compaction by promoting looping of the DNA.

The recombination-activating gene products, RAG1 and RAG2, initiate V(D)J recombination during lymphocyte development by cleaving DNA adjacent to conserved recombination signal sequences (RSSs). The reaction involves DNA binding, synapsis, and cleavage at two RSSs located on the same DNA molecule and results in the assembly of antigen receptor genes. We have developed singlemolecule assays to examine RSS binding by RAG1/2 and their cofactor high-mobility group-box protein 1 (HMGB1) as they proceed through the steps of this reaction. These assays allowed us to observe in real time the individual molecular events of RAG-mediated cleavage. As a result, we are able to measure the binding statistics (dwell times) and binding energies of the initial RAG binding events and characterize synapse formation at the single-molecule level, yielding insights into the distribution of dwell times in the paired complex and the propensity for cleavage on forming the synapse. Interestingly, we find that the synaptic complex has a mean lifetime of roughly 400 s and that its formation is readily reversible, with only ∼40% of observed synapses resulting in cleavage at consensus RSS binding sites. The recombination-activating genes, RAG1 and RAG2, encode proteins that carry out V(D)J recombination by bringing a 12RSS and a 23RSS together into a paired (or synaptic) complex, nicking the RSS sites adjacent to the heptamer, and converting each nick into a double-strand break, leaving a hairpin at the coding end (Fig. 1). The hairpin is created by nucleophilic attack on the opposing strand by the 3′ hydroxyl group at the nick in a transesterification reaction. After RAG1/2 forms hairpins, it recruits the nonhomologous end joining machinery to repair the ends (1, 2). Since their discovery, the full-length RAG1 and RAG2 proteins have proven difficult to isolate and study in vitro (1). However, core domains (referred to as RAG1c and RAG2c) have been identified by removing a large region from the N terminus of RAG1 (which includes an E3 ubiquitin ligase domain) and a large region from the C terminus of RAG2 (which includes a plant homeodomain) (3, 4). These core proteins have been shown to tetramerize to form RAG1/2c, which retains RSS binding, nicking, and hairpin formation activities (5). High-mobility group-box protein 1 (HMGB1) acts as a cofactor and increases RAG1/2c affinity for the 23RSS (6). HMGB1 is required for paired complex formation and efficient conversion of RAG-mediated nicks into hairpins (7-10).Current in vitro assays that capture the paired complex with RAG1/2c generally place a 12RSS and a 23RSS on two different DNA molecules, typically short oligonucleotides. However, in vivo, antigen receptor loci are assembled using RSSs on the same DNA molecule (1, 11). One prior study captured RAG1/2c and HMGB1 bound to DNA with a 12RSS and a 23RSS on the same substrate using standard bulk assays (12). However, many key mechanistic questions remain unresolved concerning how a diverse immune repertoire is generated by the RAG recombinas...

Dendritic cell (DC) activation and antigen presentation are critical for efficient priming of T cell responses. Here, we study how lentiviral vectors (LVs) deliver antigen and activate DCs to generate T cell immunization in vivo. We report that antigenic proteins delivered in vector particles via pseudotransduction were sufficient to stimulate an antigen-specific immune response. The delivery of the viral genome encoding the antigen increased the magnitude of this response in vivo but was irrelevant in vitro. Activation of DCs by LVs was independent of MyD88, TRIF, and MAVS, ruling out an involvement of Toll-like receptor or RIG-I–like receptor signaling. Cellular DNA packaged in LV preparations induced DC activation by the host STING (stimulator of interferon genes) and cGAS (cyclic guanosine monophosphate–adenosine monophosphate synthase) pathway. Envelope-mediated viral fusion also activated DCs in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase–dependent but STING-independent process. Pseudotransduction, transduction, viral fusion, and delivery of cellular DNA collaborate to make the DC-targeted LV preparation an effective immunogen.

Abstract Developing lymphocytes of jawed vertebrates cleave and combine distinct gene segments to assemble antigen–receptor genes. This process called V(D)J recombination that involves the RAG recombinase binding and cutting recombination signal sequences (RSSs) composed of conserved heptamer and nonamer sequences flanking less well-conserved 12- or 23-bp spacers. Little quantitative information is known about the contributions of individual RSS positions over the course of the RAG–RSS interaction. We employ a single-molecule method known as tethered particle motion to track the formation, lifetime and cleavage of individual RAG–12RSS–23RSS paired complexes (PCs) for numerous synthetic and endogenous 12RSSs. We reveal that single-bp changes, including in the 12RSS spacer, can significantly and selectively alter PC formation or the probability of RAG-mediated cleavage in the PC. We find that some rarely used endogenous gene segments can be mapped directly to poor RAG binding on their adjacent 12RSSs. Finally, we find that while abrogating RSS nicking with Ca2+ leads to substantially shorter PC lifetimes, analysis of the complete lifetime distributions of any 12RSS even on this reduced system reveals that the process of exiting the PC involves unidentified molecular details whose involvement in RAG–RSS dynamics are crucial to quantitatively capture kinetics in V(D)J recombination.