The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) are each creating quantitative databases containing the vapor-phase infrared spectra of pure chemicals. The digital databases have been created with both laboratory and remote-sensing applications in mind. A spectral resolution of approximate, equals 0.1 cm(-1) was selected to avoid degrading sharp spectral features, while also realizing that atmospheric broadening typically limits line widths to 0.1 cm(-1). Calculated positional (wave- number, cm(-1)) uncertainty is /=9) path length-concentration burdens and fitting a weighted Beer's law plot to each wavenumber channel. The two databases include different classes of compounds and were compared using 12 samples. Though these 12 samples span a range of polarities, absorption strengths, and vapor pressures, the data agree to within experimental uncertainties with only one exception.

With the recent developments in Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers it is becoming more feasible to place these instruments in field environments. As a result, there has been enormous increase in the use of FTIR techniques for a variety of qualitative and quantitative chemical measurements. These methods offer the possibility of fully automated real-time quantitation of many analytes; therefore FTIR has great potential as an analytical tool. Recently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA) has developed protocol methods for emissions monitoring using both extractive and open-path FTIR measurements. Depending upon the analyte, the experimental conditions and the analyte matrix, approximately 100 of the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) listed in the 1990 U.S.EPA Clean Air Act amendment (CAAA) can be measured. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has initiated a program to provide quality-assured infrared absorption coefficient data based on NIST prepared primary gas standards. Currently, absorption coefficient data has been acquired for approximately 20 of the HAPs. For each compound, the absorption coefficient spectrum was calculated using nine transmittance spectra at 0.12 cm−1 resolution and the Beer’s law relationship. The uncertainties in the absorption coefficient data were estimated from the linear regressions of the transmittance data and considerations of other error sources such as the nonlinear detector response. For absorption coefficient values greater than 1 × 10−4 μmol/mol)−1 m−1 the average relative expanded uncertainty is 2.2 %. This quantitative infrared database is currently an ongoing project at NIST. Additional spectra will be added to the database as they are acquired. Our current plans include continued data acquisition of the compounds listed in the CAAA, as well as the compounds that contribute to global warming and ozone depletion.

Between June 2010 and June 2011, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) gravimetrically prepared a suite of 20 carbon dioxide (CO2) in air primary standard mixtures (PSMs). Ambient mole fraction levels were obtained through six levels of dilution beginning with pure (99.999%) CO2. The sixth level covered the ambient range from 355 to 404 μmol/mol. This level will be used to certify cylinder mixtures of compressed dry whole air from both the northern and southern hemispheres as NIST standard reference materials (SRMs). The first five levels of PSMs were verified against existing PSMs in a balance of air or nitrogen with excellent agreement observed (the average percent difference between the calculated and analyzed values was 0.002%). After the preparation of a new suite of PSMs at ambient level, they were compared to an existing suite of PSMs. It was observed that the analyzed concentration of the new PSMs was less than the calculated gravimetric concentration by as much as 0.3% relative. The existing PSMs had been used in a Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance-Metrology in Chemistry Key Comparison (K-52) in which there was excellent agreement (the NIST-analyzed value was -0.09% different from the calculated value, while the average of the difference for all 18 participants was -0.10%) with those of other National Metrology Institutes and World Meteorological Organization designated laboratories. In order to determine the magnitude of these losses at the ambient level, a series of "daughter/mother" tests were initiated and conducted in which the gas mixture containing CO2 from a "mother" cylinder was transferred into an evacuated "daughter" cylinder. These cylinder pairs were then compared using cavity ring-down spectroscopy under high reproducibility conditions (the average percent relative standard deviation of sample response was 0.02). A ratio of the daughter instrument response to the mother response was calculated, with the resultant deviation from unity being a measure of the CO2 loss or gain. Cylinders from three specialty gas vendors were tested to find the appropriate cylinder in which to prepare the new PSMs. All cylinders tested showed a loss of CO2, presumably to the walls of the cylinder. The vendor cylinders exhibiting the least loss of CO2 were then purchased to be used to gravimetrically prepare the PSMs, adjusting the calculated mole fraction for the loss bias and an uncertainty calculated from this work.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) are independently creating quantitative, ~0.10 cm -1 resolution, infrared spectral libraries of vapor phase compounds. The NIST library will consist of approximately 100 vapor phase spectra of volatile hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and suspected greenhouse gases. The PNNL library will consist of approximately 400 vapor phase spectra associated with DOE's remediation mission.A critical part of creating and validating any quantitative work involves independent verification based on inter-laboratory comparisons. The two laboratories use significantly different sample preparation and handling techniques. NIST uses gravimetric dilution and a continuous flowing sample while PNNL uses partial pressure dilution and a static sample. Agreement is generally found to be within the statistical uncertainties (k = 2, 2σ) of the Beer's law fit and less than 3 % of the total integrated band areas for the 4 chemicals used in this comparison. There does appear to be a small (~1.5 %) systematic difference between the PNNL and NIST data, however. Possible sources of the systematic difference will be discussed as well as technical details concerning the sample preparation and the procedures for overcoming instrumental artifacts.