In this paper, we exam how the financial markets reacted to the emergence of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act as it developed through the legislative process from policy concept to signed law. We find that investors, on the one hand, desired clarity and sustainable oversight of market activities, but simultaneously feared the possibility of over-burdensome regulation. As the legislative process developed, markets cheered any watering down of perceived over-restrictive provisions with a positive response. We also empirically noted the smaller banks stocks were generally unaffected by the entire emergence of Dodd-Frank, with nearly all of the market reaction (positive and negative) occurring with larger banks stocks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.