There have been few attempts to assess the validity of occupational histories obtained from interviews. A nested case-control study of lung cancer conducted in 1985 among a cohort of 19,608 male workers at a Texas chemical production facility provided such an opportunity. Telephone interviews were attempted with 308 lung cancer patients and 588 matched controls or their next of kin in order to gather information on tobacco use, diet, places of residence, and occupations. Interview data from 734 respondents (143 subjects and 591 next of kin) were then compared with the records of work area assignments maintained by the company and with exposure profiles developed by an industrial hygienist. Respondents recalled 48.4 per cent of all documented work area assignments, but only 2.6 per cent of the chemical agents judged as likely exposures. Recall of usual work area assignment was 70.8 per cent. Among the factors found to have most influenced recall were the number and durations of assignments, a subjective assessment of the quality of the interview, and the relationship of the interview respondent to the subject. The elapsed time from job assignment to interview was also found to affect recall of the longest assignment of the subject.

A recent cohort mortality study of 19,608 male employees of a major Texas chemical production facility had suggested that they might be at higher risk of lung cancer compared with the male population of the United States or Texas but not with the male population of the five-county area in which they reside. An occupational exposure was a possible explanation for this pattern, and a nested case-control study was undertaken of the 308 lung cancer deaths observed between 1940 and 1981. Two control groups, one a decedent and the other a "living" series, were individually matched to cases one-for-one. Interviews were conducted with subjects or their next of kin to collect information on smoking and other potential confounders. These data were combined with employee work history records and industrial hygiene data to form the basis of the analyses. Traditional stratification methods and conditional logistic regression were employed to examine for effect modification and to control confounding. Statistically significant, positive and negative associations were found for assignment to several work areas within the facility. Suggestive associations were observed for exposure to sulfur dioxide and heat. These and additional associations are discussed relative to evidence from other studies.

An in-plant case-control study of 26 renal cancer deaths was conducted to determine whether an occupational exposure may be related to an apparent increase in mortality from this disease observed among a sample of employees at a multiple process chemical production facility. None was found that explained the excess. Elevated odds ratios were identified for employment in the cell maintenance area of chlorine production and with those presumptive exposures considered to occur in this job, asbestos and caustic, but not chlorine. While an association between renal cancer and asbestos has been previously reported, an association with caustic, per se, is not consistent with prior observations made by others. Diminished risk estimates were observed for employment in magnesium production and for exposures in this process to sulfur dioxide and heat. Both the increased and decreased risks, while statistically significant, are based on small numbers of exposed subjects and may be spurious owing to the problem of multiple comparisons.