In an effort to identify variables that could be used to predict outcomes of amputation, a cohort of 97 veteran amputees with a median age of 64 years who underwent 155 lower extremity procedures during 1984 was followed for 15 months. A high incidence of postoperative complication, revision, and mortality with poor quality of life confirm the serious prognosis of these individuals. Regression analyses indicated that peripheral vascular disease and prolonged preoperative hospitalization were associated with complications. Preoperative gangrene and peripheral vascular disease were associated with the need for revision. Complications, a low body mass index, and multiple diseases were related to death. Those with multiple diseases and extensive atherosclerosis were less likely to walk. Ability to perform activities of daily living was the most important predictor of quality of life. Patients at higher risk for these adverse outcomes need to be identified early in their hospital stay. The involvement of the patient or his or her surrogate in decisions regarding the course of treatment and the level of amputation is essential.

Infections worldwide are the primary cause of morbidity and mortality today. The need for prevention is essential. Prophylactic surgery with the reduction of infectious disease has been available for many millennia, but its recognition has been questionably accepted. This article presents evidence of former times when circumcision was performed in the ancient Egyptian, Coptic and Ethiopian cultures, probably as a therapeutic measure to combat the ravages of schistosomal infectious symptomatology. How this health measure was converted to a religious rite and the confusion caused by this misunderstanding is fully explored. The association of an operative procedure as a religious ritual among Jews, and Christian Biblical ambiguity toward it, has further clouded the issue. Neonatal circumcision has been perpetuated in many societies and cultures, not because of the Jews and their Covenant of Circumcision, but because of its merit as a secular surgical prophylactic health measure. This article explores an interesting issue from its beginning to contemporary research and findings that justify the procedure as a viable option in maintaining and promoting quality genital health care for males of all ages.

Controversy continues to surround the issue of male circumcision, especially in the United States. The following report reviews the history of this practice, along with the medical and sociopolitical positions currently espoused. It is our conclusion that, as the safest and most commonly performed surgical procedure in this country, the benefits of posthetomy, which include a reduction in some kinds of cancer and sexually transmitted diseases, well outweigh the risks cited by those who oppose it.

No abstract

No abstract