There falls into the hands of every reconstructive surgeon a certain group of cases in which postauricular defects have been operated on repeatedly with little or no success. These defects may be the result of uncontrolled infection, of incomplete operation on the mastoid, such as simple antrotomy and poorly executed radical mastoidectomy, or, as in one case which we observed, of the spontaneous perforation of an untreated diseased mastoid.The resulting unsightly defect is manifested as a depression in the region of the former mastoid prominence, covered wholly or in part by a thin, reddened and contracted scar, which is usually painful in varying degrees and is further made an annoyance by a discharge.With the demands on the modern plastic surgeon becoming more and more exacting, the need was felt for a review of this problem. The anatomic and surgical questions presented were reconsidered in order to establish some operative principles to insure, as far as possible, satisfactory functional and cosmetic results.
REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREZoufal * in his description of the first radical mastoidectomies con¬ sidered a permanent postauricular opening essential. This was dis¬ figuring. Epithelization was allowed to take place from behind the ear rather than encouraged by splitting the membranous external auditory meatus after immediate closure of the wound, as is now commonly done. The endaural approach, revived by Lempert,2 gives excellent results from the cosmetic point of view.From the
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.